Page 1 of 2   1 2 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add Erratic GPS recording to Yahoo MyWeb Add Erratic GPS recording to Google Bookmarks Add Erratic GPS recording to Windows Live Add Erratic GPS recording to Del.icio.us Digg Erratic GPS recording! Add Erratic GPS recording to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Terry Pinnell on March 28, 2010, 5:10 am


My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.

It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?

--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK

Posted by Mike Coon on March 28, 2010, 5:52 am


Terry Pinnell wrote:
> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of
> rain) on my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile
> 6.1) was the worst I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles,
> due to several bursts of erratic signals that went way outside the
> immediate vicinity. Like most of my walks, this included a proportion
> of lightly wooded track, but in the past that has just resulted in
> lost signals, not false ones.
> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort
> of behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results
> please?

Could it be due to extrapolation during signal loss? If you are walking
straight this could be accurate but if dodging and weaving it could
exaggerate this.

Mike.
--
If reply address is invalid, remove spurious "@" and substitute "plus"
where needed.



Posted by Terry Pinnell on March 30, 2010, 3:26 am



>Terry Pinnell wrote:
>> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of
>> rain) on my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile
>> 6.1) was the worst I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles,
>> due to several bursts of erratic signals that went way outside the
>> immediate vicinity. Like most of my walks, this included a proportion
>> of lightly wooded track, but in the past that has just resulted in
>> lost signals, not false ones.
>> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
>> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort
>> of behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results
>> please?
>Could it be due to extrapolation during signal loss? If you are walking
>straight this could be accurate but if dodging and weaving it could
>exaggerate this.
>Mike.

Well, we did do a fair bit of stopping to study the map, as there were
sections with a surplus of paths through the woods and poor signing. But not
much more than usual.

Anyone else with any recordings of walks/drives from Sunday?

--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK

Posted by jaf on March 28, 2010, 8:22 am



> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
> my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
> I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
> erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
> walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
> that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.
>
> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
> behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?
>
> --
> Terry, East Grinstead, UK

You got 11 miles of exercise in 8 miles, and you're complaining?


John


Posted by Wayne R. on March 28, 2010, 8:33 am


The satellites themselves won't deteriorate en masse, but their
constellation for a particular place & time might be less than
optimal.

Trimble's "Planning Software" is designed to provide that sort of
insight.

<http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware.shtml>

It's been a while since I've used it - I'm not sure it can be
retroactive, but don't see why it couldn't be used that way. Try it
out.


On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:10:37 +0100, Terry Pinnell

>My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
>my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
>I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
>erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
>walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
>that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.
>It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
>satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
>behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?

Page 1 of 2   1 2 > last >>