
- postprocessing-for-GPS-data-loggers
- 10-27-2006
![]() Re: post-processing for GPS data loggers?
| Richard Owlett | 10-27-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: post-processing for GPS data loggers?
| Stichting ST | 10-27-2006 |
![]() Re: post-processing for GPS data loggers?
| Adrian Jansen | 10-27-2006 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Dear group---
I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
transport systems in the
Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
characteristics:
- low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
of downloading the data after the trip.
- changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
minimally.
- 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
- rugged and water-resistant
- tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
intervals (48,000 positions).
- low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
+ software costs if necessary.
I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
projects with Garmins please let me know.
Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
knowledge, allow for post-processing.
Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
antenna would be the way to go.
Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
Nico Tripcevich
---
Nicholas Tripcevich
UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
ntripcevich@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear group---
> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
> transport systems in the
> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
> characteristics:
> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
> of downloading the data after the trip.
> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
> minimally.
> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
> - rugged and water-resistant
> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
> intervals (48,000 positions).
> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
> + software costs if necessary.
>
> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>
> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>
> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
> antenna would be the way to go.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>
> Nico Tripcevich
>
> ---
> Nicholas Tripcevich
> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>
> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
> transport systems in the
> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
> characteristics:
> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
> of downloading the data after the trip.
> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
> minimally.
> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
> - rugged and water-resistant
> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
> intervals (48,000 positions).
> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
> + software costs if necessary.
>
> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>
> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>
> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
> antenna would be the way to go.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>
> Nico Tripcevich
>
> ---
> Nicholas Tripcevich
> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>
For the *logging* function you might contact Prairie Geomatics Ltd
http://www.prairie.mb.ca/gpsdatalogger.htm
Their standard unit would not be suitable for logging data format
required for post processing. But I'm under the impression that the unit
physically can accept any serial ASCII data stream. I would require
modified firmware. They, or their oem , may have already done something
similar.
wrote:
>ntripcevich@gmail.com wrote:
>> Dear group---
>> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
>> transport systems in the
>> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
>> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
>> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
>> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
>> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
>> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
>> characteristics:
>> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
>> of downloading the data after the trip.
>> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
>> minimally.
>> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
>> - rugged and water-resistant
>> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
>> intervals (48,000 positions).
>> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
>> + software costs if necessary.
>>
>> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
>> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
>> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
>> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
>> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
>> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
>> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
>> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>>
>> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
>> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
>> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>>
>> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
>> antenna would be the way to go.
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>>
>> Nico Tripcevich
>>
>> ---
>> Nicholas Tripcevich
>> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>>
>> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
>> transport systems in the
>> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
>> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
>> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
>> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
>> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
>> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
>> characteristics:
>> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
>> of downloading the data after the trip.
>> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
>> minimally.
>> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
>> - rugged and water-resistant
>> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
>> intervals (48,000 positions).
>> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
>> + software costs if necessary.
>>
>> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
>> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
>> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
>> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
>> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
>> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
>> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
>> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>>
>> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
>> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
>> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>>
>> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
>> antenna would be the way to go.
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>>
>> Nico Tripcevich
>>
>> ---
>> Nicholas Tripcevich
>> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>>
>For the *logging* function you might contact Prairie Geomatics Ltd
>http://www.prairie.mb.ca/gpsdatalogger.htm
>Their standard unit would not be suitable for logging data format
>required for post processing. But I'm under the impression that the unit
>physically can accept any serial ASCII data stream. I would require
>modified firmware. They, or their oem , may have already done something
>similar.
Take a look at
>http://www.prairie.mb.ca/gpsdatalogger.htm
>Their standard unit would not be suitable for logging data format
>required for post processing. But I'm under the impression that the unit
>physically can accept any serial ASCII data stream. I would require
>modified firmware. They, or their oem , may have already done something
>similar.
http://shop.delorme.com/OA_HTML/DELibeCCtpItmDspRte.jsp?item=18902§ion=10047&beginIndex=0&forge_prod=BFF318E33E4FBBB576C2A90077934741&forge_prod_pses=forge_prod%3DBFF318E33E4FBBB576C2A90077934741%7E
GPS PostPro 2.0 & Earthmate GPS BUNDLE
And there is a forum about all aspects such as better batteries.
http://forums.delorme.com/index.php?c=19
The first one with software comes to 299 $ More extra GPSr's are cheaper (by
the dozen f.i.)
Piet
Piet
ntripcevich@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear group---
> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
> transport systems in the
> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
> characteristics:
> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
> of downloading the data after the trip.
> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
> minimally.
> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
> - rugged and water-resistant
> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
> intervals (48,000 positions).
> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
> + software costs if necessary.
>
> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>
> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>
> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
> antenna would be the way to go.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>
> Nico Tripcevich
>
> ---
> Nicholas Tripcevich
> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>
This unit might get close to what you want:
> I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
> transport systems in the
> Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
> tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
> terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
> travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
> America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
> post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
> characteristics:
> - low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
> of downloading the data after the trip.
> - changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
> minimally.
> - 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
> - rugged and water-resistant
> - tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
> intervals (48,000 positions).
> - low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
> + software costs if necessary.
>
> I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
> are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
> energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
> passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
> recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
> approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
> post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
> projects with Garmins please let me know.
>
> Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
> for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
> knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>
> Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
> antenna would be the way to go.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>
> Nico Tripcevich
>
> ---
> Nicholas Tripcevich
> UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=657
--
Regards,
Adrian Jansen adrianjansen at internode dot on dot net
Design Engineer J & K Micro Systems
Microcomputer solutions for industrial control
Note reply address is invalid, convert address above to machine form.
You might take a look at the Sony GPS-CS1 digital camera GPS unit. I
just got one for $95. It does most of what you want. Even though
it's designed to be used with Sony's CyberShot cameras, it's just a
GPS datalogger with the necessary software for updating jpeg EXIF
headers. It uses one AA battery, stores 32MB of data points in one
NMEA 0183 raw data format text file. That's suppose to be 15-30 days
of logging. I guess it depends on how long you leave it on each day.
With NiMH batteries, you get about 14 hours. I get over that with the
NiMH batteries I was using. The data points are logged at 15 second
intervals. You plug the GPS into your computer and it looks like a
disk drive so it's very easy to transfer the data file. I used
GPSBabel to convert the data to plot with Garmin Mapsource and Google
Earth. It's not as sensitive as my Garmin Nuvi, but it does exactly
what I want.
James
On 27 Oct 2006 08:43:27 -0700, ntripcevich@gmail.com wrote:
>Dear group---
>I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
>transport systems in the
>Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
>tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
>terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
>travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
>America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
>post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
>characteristics:
>- low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
>of downloading the data after the trip.
>- changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
>minimally.
>- 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
>- rugged and water-resistant
>- tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
>intervals (48,000 positions).
>- low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
>+ software costs if necessary.
>I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
>are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
>energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
>passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
>recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
>approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
>post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
>projects with Garmins please let me know.
>Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
>for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
>knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
>antenna would be the way to go.
>Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>Nico Tripcevich
>---
>Nicholas Tripcevich
>UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
>I'm planning a research project where I aim to study traditional
>transport systems in the
>Andes (South America) and I'd like to install a series of GPS units for
>tracking. Some of these groups will be moving slowly through difficult
>terrain (ie, llama caravans) and I'd like to get detailed info on
>travel velocity with respect to slope. There is no WAAS in South
>America, but we're ~150km from the IGS base station AREQ so I hope to
>post-process using that data that can be acquired on the web.
>I'm wondering if anyone can suggest GPS solution that has the following
>characteristics:
>- low energy consumption. Preferably no onboard interface, just a way
>of downloading the data after the trip.
>- changable batteries (AA hopefully) last 1 or 2 days per set
>minimally.
>- 2-5m horizontal accuracy with post-processing
>- rugged and water-resistant
>- tracking capability to hold >200 hrs of tracking at 15 second
>intervals (48,000 positions).
>- low cost so I can install a number of them. Hopefully under $200 each
>+ software costs if necessary.
>I've found that Trimble doesn't make such a thing. All that they have
>are antennas like the Pathfinder XB that connects with a PDA (too much
>energy use, expensive and unnecessary). The perfect solution would be a
>passive data logger connected to a Trimble unit like that and I could
>recover the SSF files after the fact and post-process those. Another
>approach that I'm looking at is getting a Garmin units with Rhino Rover
>post-processing software. If anyone has experience with long tracking
>projects with Garmins please let me know.
>Finally there are a number of devices that are EXACTLY what I'm looking
>for that have been used in commuter studies but none of them, to my
>knowledge, allow for post-processing.
>Perhaps a customized solution with datalogger connected to a Trimble
>antenna would be the way to go.
>Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
>Nico Tripcevich
>---
>Nicholas Tripcevich
>UC Santa Barbara Anthropology
- GRINGO for post-processing ?
- Satellite Navigation
- 2006-02-21
- Post- Processing Rinex Data
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-03-14
- tagging digital photos with gps data
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-03-19
- GPS Data Logger
- Global Positioning System
- 2007-09-06






