If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
The U.S. military's newest Global Positioning System navigation
satellite is suffering from unusual signal distortions that will keep
it out of service for at least six months, the Air Force announced
Tuesday.
"The signal distortion was initially observed as an elevation-
dependent bias in ranging measurements from GPS monitor stations," the
Air Force said in a written statement from the Space and Missile
Systems Center.
See the whole story at spaceflightnow.com at
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0906/17gps2r20/
JT
kr5j wrote:
The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
intelligence. I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
reports all stop there. If they really know what is going wrong why
isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht Android 1.5 (Cupcake) and Fedora-11
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
>> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
>> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
>> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
>> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
>> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
>> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
>
> While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
> the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> intelligence. I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> reports all stop there. If they really know what is going wrong why
> isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
>
> -wolfgang
Press releases are written by PR people without the technical expertise
> While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
> the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> intelligence. I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> reports all stop there. If they really know what is going wrong why
> isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
>
> -wolfgang
to provide a proper explanation. I for one would prefer that the
engineers spend the time fixing the problem. Even educating a highly
skilled engineer on a part of a subsystem is time consuming, think about
what it would take educate a administrator or PR person. Why do we as
users need to know the details?
Clair
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> >> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
> >> and will attempt to work around the problem. =A0If they can do that
> >> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> >>http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
> >> and will attempt to work around the problem. =A0If they can do that
> >> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> >>http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
> > While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
> > the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> > intelligence. =A0I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> > anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> > reports all stop there. =A0If they really know what is going wrong why
> > isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
> > -wolfgang
> > the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> > intelligence. =A0I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> > anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> > reports all stop there. =A0If they really know what is going wrong why
> > isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
> > -wolfgang
> Press releases are written by PR people without the technical expertise
> =A0 to provide a proper explanation. =A0I for one would prefer that the
> engineers spend the time fixing the problem. =A0Even educating a highly
> skilled engineer on a part of a subsystem is time consuming, think about
> =A0 what it would take educate a administrator or PR person. =A0Why do we=
as
> =A0 to provide a proper explanation. =A0I for one would prefer that the
> engineers spend the time fixing the problem. =A0Even educating a highly
> skilled engineer on a part of a subsystem is time consuming, think about
> =A0 what it would take educate a administrator or PR person. =A0Why do we=
> users need to know the details?
> Clair
> Clair
Granted for 99.9% of the users GPS is an appliance. That other 0.1%
who are industry oriented analysts or, maybe, just enthusiasts care a
lot about the details.
Eventually, an open technical explanation will be provided. I'm
interested in its details.
--- CHAS
- Lunch Preparations underway.... Global Positioning System 2R-M1 satellite - PRELIMINARY ORBIT!
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-09-25
- Simple Overview -- General Relativity in the Global Positioning System
- Global Positioning System
- 2009-02-24
- From the Federal Register: Codeless and Semi-Codeless Access to the Global Positioning System
- Global Positioning System
- 2008-06-06
- DoD Permanently Discontinues Procurement Of Global Positioning System Selective Availability
- Global Positioning System
- 2007-09-27

> satellite is suffering from unusual signal distortions that will keep
> it out of service for at least six months, the Air Force announced
> Tuesday.
>
> "The signal distortion was initially observed as an elevation-
> dependent bias in ranging measurements from GPS monitor stations," the
> Air Force said in a written statement from the Space and Missile
> Systems Center.
>
> See the whole story at spaceflightnow.com at
>
> http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0906/17gps2r20/
>
> JT