Page 1 of 4   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite to Yahoo MyWeb Add Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite to Google Bookmarks Add Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite to Windows Live Add Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite to Del.icio.us Digg Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite! Add Trouble aboard latest Global Positioning System satellite to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by kr5j on June 17, 2009, 2:51 pm


The U.S. military's newest Global Positioning System navigation
satellite is suffering from unusual signal distortions that will keep
it out of service for at least six months, the Air Force announced
Tuesday.

"The signal distortion was initially observed as an elevation-
dependent bias in ranging measurements from GPS monitor stations," the
Air Force said in a written statement from the Space and Missile
Systems Center.

See the whole story at spaceflightnow.com at

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0906/17gps2r20/

JT

Posted by Sam Wormley on June 17, 2009, 3:08 pm


kr5j wrote:
> The U.S. military's newest Global Positioning System navigation
> satellite is suffering from unusual signal distortions that will keep
> it out of service for at least six months, the Air Force announced
> Tuesday.
>
> "The signal distortion was initially observed as an elevation-
> dependent bias in ranging measurements from GPS monitor stations," the
> Air Force said in a written statement from the Space and Missile
> Systems Center.
>
> See the whole story at spaceflightnow.com at
>
> http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0906/17gps2r20/
>
> JT


The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
PRN01 might be set usable this fall.

http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573


Posted by Wolfgang S. Rupprecht on June 17, 2009, 11:47 pm



> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573

While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
intelligence. I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
reports all stop there. If they really know what is going wrong why
isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?

-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht Android 1.5 (Cupcake) and Fedora-11

Posted by Clair Johnston on June 18, 2009, 6:08 am


Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
>> and will attempt to work around the problem. If they can do that
>> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
>> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
>
> While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
> the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> intelligence. I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> reports all stop there. If they really know what is going wrong why
> isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
>
> -wolfgang
Press releases are written by PR people without the technical expertise
to provide a proper explanation. I for one would prefer that the
engineers spend the time fixing the problem. Even educating a highly
skilled engineer on a part of a subsystem is time consuming, think about
what it would take educate a administrator or PR person. Why do we as
users need to know the details?

Clair

Posted by HIPAR on June 18, 2009, 12:25 pm


> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> >> The Air Force has identified the cause of signal anomalies for PRN01
> >> and will attempt to work around the problem. =A0If they can do that
> >> PRN01 might be set usable this fall.
> >>http://www.insidegnss.com/node/1573
> > While I'm really happy that the military provides the GPS for our use,
> > the announcements they issue read like a bad joke about military
> > intelligence. =A0I've read about a dozen reports now that "a signal
> > anomaly has been detected and they think they can correct it", but the
> > reports all stop there. =A0If they really know what is going wrong why
> > isn't there a proper explanation in that press release?
> > -wolfgang
> Press releases are written by PR people without the technical expertise
> =A0 to provide a proper explanation. =A0I for one would prefer that the
> engineers spend the time fixing the problem. =A0Even educating a highly
> skilled engineer on a part of a subsystem is time consuming, think about
> =A0 what it would take educate a administrator or PR person. =A0Why do we=
as
> users need to know the details?
> Clair

Granted for 99.9% of the users GPS is an appliance. That other 0.1%
who are industry oriented analysts or, maybe, just enthusiasts care a
lot about the details.

Eventually, an open technical explanation will be provided. I'm
interested in its details.

--- CHAS


Page 1 of 4   1 2 3 > last >>