Page 1 of 4   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011 to Yahoo MyWeb Add PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011 to Google Bookmarks Add PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011 to Windows Live Add PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011 to Del.icio.us Digg PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011! Add PNT Advisory Board Meeting  9 10 Nov 2011 to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Ed M. on November 11, 2011, 12:16 pm
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
Advisory Board Agenda
Ninth Meeting, November 9-10, 2011

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/

FAA Alternative PNT study (DME, ADS-B, pseudolites):

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/eldredge.pdf

Considerations for Constellation Sustainment:

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/lewis1.pdf

Discussion of a standard certification process for GPS receivers:

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/mcneff.pdf

Some examples of designing more robust receivers:

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/scott.pdf

Several briefings on LightSquared issues. Javad Ashjaee goes into
great detail (e.g., cost figures on Slide 30):

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/ashjaee.pdf

Garmin rebuts -- concise summary on Slide 4:

http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/burgett.pdf

Posted by Alan Browne on November 11, 2011, 2:09 pm
On 2011-11-11 12:16 , Ed M. wrote:
> National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
> Advisory Board Agenda
<snip>

Thanks for the list.

> Several briefings on LightSquared issues. Javad Ashjaee goes into
> great detail (e.g., cost figures on Slide 30):

> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/ashjaee.pdf
Not exactly an impartial presenter.

And of course it completely ignores:

1. - Cost of retrofit in aviation systems.
- Cost of re-certification of receivers AND nav systems
that use them. [as also stated in the Garmin presentation below]
- the use of some receivers (esp. ground stations) of the entire
spread spectrum.

2. Costs to replace equipment in other domains including telecoms,
marine, differential systems, survey and so on.

> Garmin rebuts -- concise summary on Slide 4:
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/burgett.pdf


--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.

Posted by HIPAR on November 13, 2011, 2:19 pm
> National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
> Advisory Board Agenda
> Ninth Meeting, November 9-10, 2011
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/
> FAA Alternative PNT study (DME, ADS-B, pseudolites):
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/eldredge.pdf
> Considerations for Constellation Sustainment:
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/lewis1.pdf
> Discussion of a standard certification process for GPS receivers:
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/mcneff.pdf
> Some examples of designing more robust receivers:
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/scott.pdf
> Several briefings on LightSquared issues. =A0Javad Ashjaee goes into
> great detail (e.g., cost figures on Slide 30):
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/ashjaee.pdf
> Garmin rebuts -- concise summary on Slide 4:
> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/burgett.pdf


There's been much said concerning GPS alternatives for aviation. But
what about GPS and maritime applications?

Automatic Identification System (AIS) is increasing in importance for
managing busy waterways and port facilities. Electronic charting
systems are becoming the norm .. to the chagrin of all those 'Old
salts'. Those alternative PNT concepts aren't much help.

What current alternative precision radionavigation is available for
mariners? LORAN could get you close so it was OK in littoral
zones .. it's gone. Radar is useful .. that's about it.

I wonder what ships far out at sea would do today without GPS. I'd
suppose large ships equipped with inertial systems can navigate fairly
well for a few days.

Nobody knows much about celestial these days although that might be
one's only option on the blue water.

Oh, I do have an old radio direction finder somewhere in the basement.

--- CHAS

Posted by Alan Browne on November 13, 2011, 5:06 pm
On 2011-11-13 14:19 , HIPAR wrote:
>> National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
>> Advisory Board Agenda
>> Ninth Meeting, November 9-10, 2011
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/
>> FAA Alternative PNT study (DME, ADS-B, pseudolites):
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/eldredge.pdf
>> Considerations for Constellation Sustainment:
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/lewis1.pdf
>> Discussion of a standard certification process for GPS receivers:
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/mcneff.pdf
>> Some examples of designing more robust receivers:
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/scott.pdf
>> Several briefings on LightSquared issues. Javad Ashjaee goes into
>> great detail (e.g., cost figures on Slide 30):
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/ashjaee.pdf
>> Garmin rebuts -- concise summary on Slide 4:
>> http://www.pnt.gov/advisory/2011/11/burgett.pdf
> There's been much said concerning GPS alternatives for aviation. But
> what about GPS and maritime applications?

GLONASS, Galileo, Compass ...

> Automatic Identification System (AIS) is increasing in importance for
> managing busy waterways and port facilities. Electronic charting
> systems are becoming the norm .. to the chagrin of all those 'Old
> salts'. Those alternative PNT concepts aren't much help.
> What current alternative precision radionavigation is available for
> mariners? LORAN could get you close so it was OK in littoral
> zones .. it's gone. Radar is useful .. that's about it.
> I wonder what ships far out at sea would do today without GPS. I'd
> suppose large ships equipped with inertial systems can navigate fairly
> well for a few days.

They did fine with VLF/Omega navigation. You don't need great precision
(VLF/Omega gave 1 - 4 NM accuracy, generally). Many airlines used it as
well. (dual INS + 1 Omega or dual Omega + 1 INS). VLF/Omege was
decommissioned in the late 90's.

Ships also used TRANSIT - a predecessor satellite system to GPS.

> Nobody knows much about celestial these days although that might be
> one's only option on the blue water.

I thought it was still required, at least to get a master mariner's
license (?)

> Oh, I do have an old radio direction finder somewhere in the basement.

Aircraft still use them (ADF) and VOR can be used as a DF, esp. in an
Radio Magnetic Indicator (RMI) configuration - not that I've seen an RMI
in 20 years or so. (An RMI has a compass card slaved to the mag compass
or INS mag heading output, and usually two needles, one pointing to the
ADF and the other selectable to VOR 1 or 2. Rather than showing course
deviation from a selected radial, it would simply point towards the VOR).

--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.

Posted by Ed M. on November 14, 2011, 4:37 pm
> Nobody knows much about celestial these days although that might be
> one's only option on the blue water.
> --- =A0CHAS

George Kaplan was formerly the director of the Astronomical
Applications (AA) department at USNO. He posts a lot of celestial
navigation information here:

http://gkaplan.us/

http://gkaplan.us/content/nav_algorithms.html

http://gkaplan.us/content/NewTech.html

This appears to be the product that Kaplan describes on his main page:

http://trexenterprises.com/Products%20and%20Services/Sensors/opticalgps.htm=
l

More pubs at USNO/AA:

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/publications/docs/reports.php

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/publications/reports/GK_posmo.pdf

Bowditch (2002 edition) can be downloaded a chapter at a time thru the
dropdown menu here:

http://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal?_nfpb=3Dtrue&_pageLabel=3Dmsi_porta=
l_page_62&pubCode=3D0002

Another interesting site:

http://www.celestialnavigation.net/

http://www.celestialnavigation.net/practice.html

Page 1 of 4   1 2 3 > last >>