![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: On why children should be exposed to quantum m...
| Hans-Georg Mich... | 10-23-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: On why children should be exposed to quantum m...
| Hans-Georg Mich... | 10-26-2010 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Anton Zeilinger: a quantum pioneer
On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early age
http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015
On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early age
http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015
Would this help?
http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/books/104879704.html
"Quantum mechanics made easy - seriously"
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com
> Anton Zeilinger: a quantum pioneer
> On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early ageh=
ttp://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015
> On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early ageh=
Well obviously a spokesman for the power-elite like "wormley" would be
having a wet dream over the idea of indoctrinating children with
various kinds of dogma at young ages so that they won't question the
blatant idiocy of quantum "concepts" when they reach college. I've
got it! Lets combine left-wing political dogma with physics dogma and
start "quantum-progressive" indoctrinatioin programs for young
children in all our schools.
=93Give me the child until he is seven and I=92ll give you the man=94.
St. Francis Xavier
Wormley-bot never fails to back the control policies of the power-
elite. "He" really needs the batteries removed from his server UPS.
Are you dumb enough to be fooled by "him"? Yeah, I thought so.
Wormley "exposing" himself to children in any way is a crime.
On a sunny day (Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:13:56 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Benj
You write crap, I thought it was a cool posting by Sam Wormley.
He parrots a lot, but the content was very good.
What are you so afraid of? Loss of your Einstein religion?
Nobody believes in him anymore these days,
hehe
>> Anton Zeilinger: a quantum pioneer
>> On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early age
>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015
>> On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early age
>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015
>Well obviously a spokesman for the power-elite like "wormley" would be
>having a wet dream over the idea of indoctrinating children with
>various kinds of dogma at young ages so that they won't question the
>blatant idiocy of quantum "concepts" when they reach college. I've
>got it! Lets combine left-wing political dogma with physics dogma and
>start "quantum-progressive" indoctrinatioin programs for young
>children in all our schools.
> Give me the child until he is seven and I'll give you the man.
> St. Francis Xavier
>Wormley-bot never fails to back the control policies of the power-
>elite. "He" really needs the batteries removed from his server UPS.
>Are you dumb enough to be fooled by "him"? Yeah, I thought so.
>Wormley "exposing" himself to children in any way is a crime.
>having a wet dream over the idea of indoctrinating children with
>various kinds of dogma at young ages so that they won't question the
>blatant idiocy of quantum "concepts" when they reach college. I've
>got it! Lets combine left-wing political dogma with physics dogma and
>start "quantum-progressive" indoctrinatioin programs for young
>children in all our schools.
> Give me the child until he is seven and I'll give you the man.
> St. Francis Xavier
>Wormley-bot never fails to back the control policies of the power-
>elite. "He" really needs the batteries removed from his server UPS.
>Are you dumb enough to be fooled by "him"? Yeah, I thought so.
>Wormley "exposing" himself to children in any way is a crime.
You write crap, I thought it was a cool posting by Sam Wormley.
He parrots a lot, but the content was very good.
What are you so afraid of? Loss of your Einstein religion?
Nobody believes in him anymore these days,
hehe
On 10-10-15 11:23 , Jan Panteltje wrote:
GPS would not be possible w/o the incorporation of both the special and
general relativity into the system in design and operation.
Newton too, of course.
As to QM, there is simply nothing simple about it.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
> What are you so afraid of? Loss of your Einstein religion?
> Nobody believes in him anymore these days,
> Nobody believes in him anymore these days,
GPS would not be possible w/o the incorporation of both the special and
general relativity into the system in design and operation.
Newton too, of course.
As to QM, there is simply nothing simple about it.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.









> On why children should be exposed to quantum mechanics from an early age
> http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1877/17632/article/indepth/44015