Bookmark this page:
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > However, I also think that whoever does so
> > should respect his audience,
> > should respect his audience,
>
> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
> instruction on posting style.
>
> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
> instruction on posting style.
>
> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
Would be against netiquette:
subjects shouldn't be changed without necessity,
Jan
On Sun, 8 May 2005 23:08:24 +0200, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder) wrote:
>> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> > However, I also think that whoever does so
>> > should respect his audience,
>> > should respect his audience,
>>
>> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
>> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
>> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
>> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
>> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
>> instruction on posting style.
>>
>> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
>> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
>> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
>> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
>> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
>> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
>> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
>> instruction on posting style.
>>
>> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
>> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
>Would be against netiquette:
>subjects shouldn't be changed without necessity,
>Jan
>subjects shouldn't be changed without necessity,
>Jan
Incessant, intransigent whining is also against netiquette.
You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
And if it's so offensive to you, then that would seem to
constitute "necessity" for your narrow purposes.
> On Sun, 8 May 2005 23:08:24 +0200, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder) wrote:
>
> Lodder) wrote:
>
> >> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >> > However, I also think that whoever does so
> >> > should respect his audience,
> >>
> >> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
> >> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
> >> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
> >> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
> >> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
> >> instruction on posting style.
> >>
> >> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
> >> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
> >> > However, I also think that whoever does so
> >> > should respect his audience,
> >>
> >> Most here would agree with that particular point, (and many would
> >> suggest that you follow your own counsel regarding respect of the
> >> audience); they would also agree that until you've been here as long as
> >> Sam, and have contributed to as much s.g.s-n as he has, it would be a
> >> really good idea to restrain yourself when it comes to giving him
> >> instruction on posting style.
> >>
> >> The mere fact that you didn't bother to decapitalize the subject in your
> >> replies puts the lie to your sincerity about the importance of it.
> >Would be against netiquette:
> >subjects shouldn't be changed without necessity,
> >Jan
> >subjects shouldn't be changed without necessity,
> >Jan
>
> Incessant, intransigent whining is also against netiquette.
> You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
> Incessant, intransigent whining is also against netiquette.
> You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
Then why don't you stop?
Jan
J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> Incessant, intransigent whining is also against netiquette.
>>You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
>>You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
>
> Then why don't you stop?
> Then why don't you stop?
Keep it up, JJ...your inability to let anyone else have the last word is
about to win me a steak dinner!
--
Noah
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >> Incessant, intransigent whining is also against netiquette.
> >>You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
> >>You really don't (or won't) know when to stop. Crybaby.
> >
> > Then why don't you stop?
> > Then why don't you stop?
>
> Keep it up, JJ...your inability to let anyone else have the last word is
> about to win me a steak dinner!
> Keep it up, JJ...your inability to let anyone else have the last word is
> about to win me a steak dinner!
Then it's very stupid of you to react.
FYI, last word score for this thread so far is:
JJL 1, Others 13, Undecided 2.
Is 1 in 15 good enough for your bet,
or do you want me to add some more?
Jan
- Opinion about buying a Gps
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-12-15
- 8 Free GPS eBooks Download
- Magellan GPS
- 2008-07-08
