Bookmark this page:
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
For anyone interested in technocratic mumbo jumbo, here's the actual
submission from Lightsquared:
http://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=871610
Whew
--- CHAS
submission from Lightsquared:
http://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=871610
Whew
--- CHAS
On 2011.03.05 23:46 , HIPAR wrote:
Whew indeed. It stinketh.
When a largely technical issue is represented by lawyers, you know that
the whole LightSquared approach is based on legal maneuvering, absorbing
time and very likely political interference in D.C., rather than a
sober, technical assessment of the risks to GPS users.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
Whew indeed. It stinketh.
When a largely technical issue is represented by lawyers, you know that
the whole LightSquared approach is based on legal maneuvering, absorbing
time and very likely political interference in D.C., rather than a
sober, technical assessment of the risks to GPS users.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
- Tests Show LightSquared Interference with 75 Percent of GPS Receivers
- Satellite Navigation
- 2011-12-20
- LightSquared Prospects; FCC Chair Wants Interference Cleared, Hits Back at GPS
- Magellan GPS
- 2011-06-16
- Lightsquared Working Group
- Satellite Navigation
- 2011-02-28
> submission from Lightsquared:
> http://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=871610
> Whew