If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
LightSquared: What It Means To the
GPS Surveying/Mapping Community
http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_062311_reg_promo.html
Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT / 1:00 p.m. EDT / 5:00 p.m. GMT
Speaker: Eric Gakstatter , Editor, GPS World 's Survey Scene Newsletter
and Geospatial Solutions
Platinum Sponsor: Hemisphere GPS
Duration: 60 minutes
See:
http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_062311_reg_promo.html
GPS Surveying/Mapping Community
http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_062311_reg_promo.html
Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT / 1:00 p.m. EDT / 5:00 p.m. GMT
Speaker: Eric Gakstatter , Editor, GPS World 's Survey Scene Newsletter
and Geospatial Solutions
Platinum Sponsor: Hemisphere GPS
Duration: 60 minutes
See:
http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_062311_reg_promo.html
I'm sure that discussion will be interesting. I can guess what
Lightsquared will do to those users. There's sufficient information
already presented.
We know:
a) Precision GPS equipment requires the entire satellite radio
navigation bandwidth. That allows mitigation of multipath, assures
best post correlation error rate and captures the P code spectral
components for receivers that might use it
b) There isn't enough guard band to allow a 90 db roll-off to reject
the overpowering LTE signals. If such a filter can be designed there
will be issues with the spectral components time relationships due to
group delay distortions
The problem for survey/avionics GPS currently is not solvable --
physics
So when working near a Lightsquared tower, surveyors will need to
brush up on pre-year 2000 skills. FAA will decertify GPS avionics and
pilots/flight management systems will go back to exclusive use of
ground nav aids.
--- CHAS
wrote:
So Lightsquared wants civilian gps users to return to the Stone Age so
they can ca$h in.
1) Frequency nterference, intentional or otherwise, is ILLEGAL.
2) Few will gain, many will suffer.
3) The Pirate Ship Lightsquared needs to be sunk. I'm sure this can
be arranged.
Lg
>> LightSquared: What It Means To the
>> GPS Surveying/Mapping Community
>> http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0 ...
>> Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011
>> Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT / 1:00 p.m. EDT / 5:00 p.m. GMT
>> Speaker: Eric Gakstatter , Editor, GPS World 's Survey Scene Newsletter
>> and Geospatial Solutions
>> Platinum Sponsor: Hemisphere GPS
>> Duration: 60 minutes
>> See:http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0 ...
>> GPS Surveying/Mapping Community
>> http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0 ...
>> Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011
>> Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT / 1:00 p.m. EDT / 5:00 p.m. GMT
>> Speaker: Eric Gakstatter , Editor, GPS World 's Survey Scene Newsletter
>> and Geospatial Solutions
>> Platinum Sponsor: Hemisphere GPS
>> Duration: 60 minutes
>> See:http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0 ...
>I'm sure that discussion will be interesting. I can guess what
>Lightsquared will do to those users. There's sufficient information
>already presented.
>We know:
>a) Precision GPS equipment requires the entire satellite radio
>navigation bandwidth. That allows mitigation of multipath, assures
>best post correlation error rate and captures the P code spectral
>components for receivers that might use it
>b) There isn't enough guard band to allow a 90 db roll-off to reject
>the overpowering LTE signals. If such a filter can be designed there
>will be issues with the spectral components time relationships due to
>group delay distortions
>The problem for survey/avionics GPS currently is not solvable --
>physics
>So when working near a Lightsquared tower, surveyors will need to
>brush up on pre-year 2000 skills. FAA will decertify GPS avionics and
>pilots/flight management systems will go back to exclusive use of
>ground nav aids.
>--- CHAS
>Lightsquared will do to those users. There's sufficient information
>already presented.
>We know:
>a) Precision GPS equipment requires the entire satellite radio
>navigation bandwidth. That allows mitigation of multipath, assures
>best post correlation error rate and captures the P code spectral
>components for receivers that might use it
>b) There isn't enough guard band to allow a 90 db roll-off to reject
>the overpowering LTE signals. If such a filter can be designed there
>will be issues with the spectral components time relationships due to
>group delay distortions
>The problem for survey/avionics GPS currently is not solvable --
>physics
>So when working near a Lightsquared tower, surveyors will need to
>brush up on pre-year 2000 skills. FAA will decertify GPS avionics and
>pilots/flight management systems will go back to exclusive use of
>ground nav aids.
>--- CHAS
So Lightsquared wants civilian gps users to return to the Stone Age so
they can ca$h in.
1) Frequency nterference, intentional or otherwise, is ILLEGAL.
2) Few will gain, many will suffer.
3) The Pirate Ship Lightsquared needs to be sunk. I'm sure this can
be arranged.
Lg






> GPS Surveying/Mapping Community
> http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0 ...
> Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011
> Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT / 1:00 p.m. EDT / 5:00 p.m. GMT
> Speaker: Eric Gakstatter , Editor, GPS World 's Survey Scene Newsletter
> and Geospatial Solutions
> Platinum Sponsor: Hemisphere GPS
> Duration: 60 minutes
> See:http://images.questex.com/GPSW/2011/MarketInsights/SC_062311/SC-GIS_0=