
- L2--House-Science-Committee--testimony
- 09-09-2011
![]() ![]() Re: L^2 - House Science Committee - testimony
| Vincent van der... | 09-09-2011 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
http://science.house.gov/hearing/full-committee-hearing-impacts-lightsquared-network
Government perspective testimony (one view of several):
http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/090811_%20Carlisle.pdf
In particular, L^2 testimony (guess what they think!):
http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/090811_%20Carlisle.pdf
Testimony with some graphs:
http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/0908011_Pace.pdf
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:11:52 -0400, Alan Browne
Licenses to transmit RF are conditional. That you do not interfere
with "other" licensed services. Otherwise, these Licenses can be
REVOKED.
Interference can take many forms, but I see an intermod signal on the
O-Scope depicted.
You get a license to drive on YOUR side of the street. When you start
crossing the middle divider, you lose the privilege.
Lg
Licenses to transmit RF are conditional. That you do not interfere
with "other" licensed services. Otherwise, these Licenses can be
REVOKED.
Interference can take many forms, but I see an intermod signal on the
O-Scope depicted.
You get a license to drive on YOUR side of the street. When you start
crossing the middle divider, you lose the privilege.
Lg
Carlisle should be shot. Seriously...
"We find longplanned and long-authorized operations threatened because the
manufacturers of GPS devices have been building and selling receivers that
ignored rules the FCC established in 2003 and 2005 with their knowledge, and
without their opposition. Nevertheless, LightSquared is committed to working
with the Committee and the agencies to do our part in addressing a problem
we did not create, and we have already made substantial and real proposals.
The interference issue is a question of technology choice, and can be
addressed through proper design."
"We find longplanned and long-authorized operations threatened because the
manufacturers of GPS devices have been building and selling receivers that
ignored rules the FCC established in 2003 and 2005 with their knowledge, and
without their opposition. Nevertheless, LightSquared is committed to working
with the Committee and the agencies to do our part in addressing a problem
we did not create, and we have already made substantial and real proposals.
The interference issue is a question of technology choice, and can be
addressed through proper design."






>Government perspective testimony (one view of several):
>http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/090811_%20Carlisle.pdf
>In particular, L^2 testimony (guess what they think!):
>http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/090811_%20Carlisle.pdf
>Testimony with some graphs:
>http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/0908011_Pace.pdf