
- GPS-on-the-iPhone-4
- 07-04-2010
![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Sam Wormley | 07-05-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Sam Wormley | 07-05-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Sam Wormley | 07-12-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 08-01-2010 |
![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| miso@sushi.com | 07-17-2010 |
![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| claudegps | 07-05-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Alan Browne | 07-12-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: GPS on the iPhone 4
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 08-01-2010 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Apple's Map + Compass
http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/maps-compass.html
iPhone 4 shares the same Broadcom BCM4750 chip as the iPad
http://www.broadcom.com/products/GPS/GPS-Silicon-Solutions/BCM4750
Download PDF
http://www.datasheetpro.com/download/pdfserv.datasheetpro.net/Broadcom/4750-PB01-R.pdf
Actual performance reports are hard to come by as of this
posting.
Somebody is happy
http://twitter.com/devth/statuses/16943439609
"GPS accuracy on iPhone 4 is way better than my old 3G:
http://rnkpr.com/a702qj compared to http://rnkpr.com/a6wo0u
9:46 AM Jun 24th via Twitter for iPhone
On the antenna issue:
Story in PC World:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/200453/antenna_expert_apple_is_right_iphone_4_signal_woes_overblown.html?tk=hp_blg
Source they cite is amusing, but low tech:
http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
is higher tech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
"The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
On 7/5/10 8:03 AM, Ed M. wrote:
> Source they cite is amusing, but low tech:
> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
> is higher tech:
> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
> is higher tech:
> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
I agree, Apple should add an insulating coating. There will still
be some capacitance coupling to hands. I don't know if that can be
sensed and corrected. I would like to think that the engineering
team considered all the possibilities.
On 7/5/10 9:35 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 7/5/10 8:03 AM, Ed M. wrote:
>> On the antenna issue:
>> Story in PC World:
>>
http://www.pcworld.com/article/200453/antenna_expert_apple_is_right_iphone_4_signal_woes_overblown.html?tk=hp_blg
>> Story in PC World:
>>
>> Source they cite is amusing, but low tech:
>> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
>> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
>> is higher tech:
>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
>> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
>> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
>> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
>> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
>> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
>> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
>> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
>> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
>> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
>> is higher tech:
>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
>> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
>> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
>> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
>> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
>> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
>> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
>> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
> I agree, Apple should add an insulating coating. There will still
> be some capacitance coupling to hands. I don't know if that can be
> sensed and corrected. I would like to think that the engineering
> team considered all the possibilities.
> be some capacitance coupling to hands. I don't know if that can be
> sensed and corrected. I would like to think that the engineering
> team considered all the possibilities.
Apple antenna issue a 'physics problem,' not a software
problem
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20009328-260.html
"Brian Klug and Anand Shimpi at tech blog Anandtech have conducted their
own hands-on experiments comparing different smartphones and their
reception when the antennas are covered. They sum up their findings this
way: "At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to
the stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
'It happens in most phones, as Apple said in its only official statement
on the matter last week. But those other phones do not have the antenna
built directly into the phone's case, and that doesn't mean the problem
can be avoided, Klug and Shimpi conclude.
"There's nothing Apple nor anyone else can do to get around physics,
plain and simple. It's something which demonstrably affects every
phone's cellular reception."'
On 7/5/10 10:56 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 7/5/10 9:35 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 7/5/10 8:03 AM, Ed M. wrote:
>>> On the antenna issue:
>>> Story in PC World:
>>>
http://www.pcworld.com/article/200453/antenna_expert_apple_is_right_iphone_4_signal_woes_overblown.html?tk=hp_blg
>>> Story in PC World:
>>>
>>> Source they cite is amusing, but low tech:
>>> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
>>> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
>>> is higher tech:
>>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
>>> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
>>> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
>>> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
>>> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
>>> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
>>> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
>>> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
>>> http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/
>>> One of the comments on the PC World story refers to this site, which
>>> is higher tech:
>>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
>>> "The fact of the matter is that either the most sensitive region of
>>> the antenna should have an insulative coating, or everyone should use
>>> a case. For a company that uses style heavily as a selling point, the
>>> latter isn't an option. And the former would require an unprecedented
>>> admission of fault on Apple's part. . . .
>>> At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to the
>>> stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
>> I agree, Apple should add an insulating coating. There will still
>> be some capacitance coupling to hands. I don't know if that can be
>> sensed and corrected. I would like to think that the engineering
>> team considered all the possibilities.
>> be some capacitance coupling to hands. I don't know if that can be
>> sensed and corrected. I would like to think that the engineering
>> team considered all the possibilities.
> Apple antenna issue a 'physics problem,' not a software
> problem
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20009328-260.html
> "Brian Klug and Anand Shimpi at tech blog Anandtech have conducted their
> own hands-on experiments comparing different smartphones and their
> reception when the antennas are covered. They sum up their findings this
> way: "At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to
> the stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
> 'It happens in most phones, as Apple said in its only official statement
> on the matter last week. But those other phones do not have the antenna
> built directly into the phone's case, and that doesn't mean the problem
> can be avoided, Klug and Shimpi conclude.
> "There's nothing Apple nor anyone else can do to get around physics,
> plain and simple. It's something which demonstrably affects every
> phone's cellular reception."'
> problem
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20009328-260.html
> "Brian Klug and Anand Shimpi at tech blog Anandtech have conducted their
> own hands-on experiments comparing different smartphones and their
> reception when the antennas are covered. They sum up their findings this
> way: "At the end of the day, Apple should add an insulative coating to
> the stainless steel band, or subsidize bumper cases. It's that simple."
> 'It happens in most phones, as Apple said in its only official statement
> on the matter last week. But those other phones do not have the antenna
> built directly into the phone's case, and that doesn't mean the problem
> can be avoided, Klug and Shimpi conclude.
> "There's nothing Apple nor anyone else can do to get around physics,
> plain and simple. It's something which demonstrably affects every
> phone's cellular reception."'
Consumer Product Rating of iPhone 4
http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/12/aside-from-signal-issue-consumer-reports-rates-iphone-4-highest-amongst-all-smartphones/
> Earlier today, a Consumer Reports post made headlines after they concluded
that they simply could not recommend the iPhone 4 due to the widely reported
signal issues related to touching the lower-left corner of the device. This
single issue alone has prevented them from fully recommending the iPhone 4.
However, their formal testing otherwise revealed that the iPhone 4 ranked the
highest amongst all smartphones in their testing.
> AllThingsD (via LoopInsight) summarizes the report (subscription required).
> The [iPhone 4] scored 76 out of 100 pointstwo points ahead of its closest
rivals, the iPhone 3Gs and the HTC Evo 4G.
> The [iPhone 4] scored 76 out of 100 pointstwo points ahead of its closest
> ...
> The product evaluation agency rated the iPhone 4 Excellent in its display,
navigation, Web browsing, multimedia and battery life categories, Very Good
> The product evaluation agency rated the iPhone 4 Excellent in its display,
in phoning and messaging and Good in voice quality.
> The iPhone 4 beat out the HTC Evo as well as all the other Smartphones and had
the highest score of 76/100. The signal issue described is that holding the
lower-left corner of the iPhone 4 can reduce cell phone signal and affect calls
in areas with lower reception. The issue depends on your local coverage and can
be alleviated with a phone case.
- GPS, GLONASS and GALILEO ?
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-09-08
- Bluetooth GPS
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-08-29
- Opinion about buying a Gps
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-12-15
- Hacking GPS - Free Book
- Magellan GPS
- 2009-02-09









> Story in PC World:
>