
- Does-averaging-improve-GPS-accuracy
- 09-20-2007
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Does averaging improve GPS accuracy?
| Filip Larsen | 09-21-2007 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi!
I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
Thanks a lot!
Anne
No. There is a worthwhile improvement in accuracy if you average over
about 10 minutes. See http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpsavg.htm
HTH, Glenn.
Anne wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
> Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
> and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
> satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
> over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Anne
>
>
> I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
> Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
> and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
> satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
> over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Anne
>
Probably not, Anne.
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_accuracy.html
> Anne wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
> > Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
> > and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
> > satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
> > over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
> > Thanks a lot!
> > Anne
> > I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
> > Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
> > and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
> > satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
> > over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
> > Thanks a lot!
> > Anne
> Probably not, Anne.
> http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_accuracy.html
> http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_accuracy.html
Thanks for the quick responses!
I took 100 GPS measurements and looked at the data two ways:
1. Plotted the data using a 10 point running average
2. Plotted the data with no averaging
The data with the 10 point running average is much tighter (the std
deviation is smaller) than with no averaging. Am I just improving
the precision not the accuracy? Accuracy can only improved over
longer periods of time?
Thanks a lot!
Anne
Anne wrote:
>> Anne wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
>>> Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
>>> and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
>>> satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
>>> over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> Anne
>>> I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
>>> Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
>>> and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
>>> satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
>>> over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> Anne
>> Probably not, Anne.
>> http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_accuracy.html
>> http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_accuracy.html
>
> Thanks for the quick responses!
>
> I took 100 GPS measurements and looked at the data two ways:
>
> 1. Plotted the data using a 10 point running average
> 2. Plotted the data with no averaging
>
> The data with the 10 point running average is much tighter (the std
> deviation is smaller) than with no averaging. Am I just improving
> the precision not the accuracy? Accuracy can only improved over
> longer periods of time?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Anne
>
> Thanks for the quick responses!
>
> I took 100 GPS measurements and looked at the data two ways:
>
> 1. Plotted the data using a 10 point running average
> 2. Plotted the data with no averaging
>
> The data with the 10 point running average is much tighter (the std
> deviation is smaller) than with no averaging. Am I just improving
> the precision not the accuracy? Accuracy can only improved over
> longer periods of time?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Anne
>
The links to David L Wilson's pages (among others) are telling.
Also keep in mind that short term averaging will have some different
effects depending on the filtering implemented in the specific receiver
design. Accuracy must include a fixed reference of some kind.
Best regards Anne
-Sam
- GPS Accuracy
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-02-17
- GPS map software for a laptop
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2012-05-21
- Map accuracy
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2011-05-02









> I have an application for the PPC that gets the location using an I-
> Blue 737 Bluetooth GPS. I get the GPGGA string and parse the latitude
> and longitude. I throw the values with a bad fix number, less than 4
> satellites and HDOP values above 6. Would averaging 10 GPS readings
> over 10 seconds improve the accuracy of the latitude and longitude?
> Thanks a lot!
> Anne