
- Detecting-a-GPS-receiver
- 11-20-2011
![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Richard Owlett | 11-20-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-20-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| David Lesher | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-29-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-20-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Mike Coon | 11-20-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Mike Coon | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| J. J. Lodder | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Mike Coon | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| J. J. Lodder | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| J. J. Lodder | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Joe Makowiec | 12-07-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Peter H. Coffin... | 12-07-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| J. J. Lodder | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 12-07-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| J. J. Lodder | 12-08-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Vincent van der... | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Richard Owlett | 11-20-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-22-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Peter H. Coffin | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-24-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-26-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-23-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-24-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| David Lesher | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Peter H. Coffin | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 11-24-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-25-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| David Lesher | 11-28-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-29-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-30-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| David Lesher | 12-01-2011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Wolfgang S. Rup... | 11-29-2011 |
![]() ![]() Re: Detecting a GPS receiver
| Alan Browne | 11-21-2011 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Is it possible to build a device that detects the demodulator clock in a
GPS receiver from a distance of 1 - 2 metres (required), 5 metres
(desired)? I would imagine that a high gain antenna would make it
possible (without detecting actual GPS since it is 'in the noise').
Are there other aspects about a GPS receiver that would make them
detectable at that distance?
Would it tend to false positive on other near clocks/harmonics
(computers operate in the L1 region too). Would a narrow enough filter
prevent that?
With all the indiscriminate tracking (by police - re: USSC case, and
possibly other people trying to track someone) there could be quite a
market for such a detector. Find it and remove it. Better yet attach
it to a city bus.
And it would be legal (vice a jammer).
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
GPS receiver from a distance of 1 - 2 metres (required), 5 metres
(desired)? I would imagine that a high gain antenna would make it
possible (without detecting actual GPS since it is 'in the noise').
Are there other aspects about a GPS receiver that would make them
detectable at that distance?
Would it tend to false positive on other near clocks/harmonics
(computers operate in the L1 region too). Would a narrow enough filter
prevent that?
With all the indiscriminate tracking (by police - re: USSC case, and
possibly other people trying to track someone) there could be quite a
market for such a detector. Find it and remove it. Better yet attach
it to a city bus.
And it would be legal (vice a jammer).
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
SNICKER
or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the
receivers
some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
Alan Browne wrote:
or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the
receivers
some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
Alan Browne wrote:
On 2011-11-20 15:47 , Richard Owlett wrote:
Unhelpful attitude, wrong attribution and you top post.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
> SNICKER
> or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
> some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
> or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
> some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
Unhelpful attitude, wrong attribution and you top post.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
> On 2011-11-20 15:47 , Richard Owlett wrote:
> > SNICKER
> > or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
> > some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
> > or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
> > some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
>
> Unhelpful attitude, wrong attribution and you top post.
> Unhelpful attitude, wrong attribution and you top post.
OK, bottom posted.
There is not any way to guarantee detection of a properly shielded GPS
receiver by its emissions.
Isaac
On 2011-11-20 23:40 , isw wrote:
I doubt most GPS receivers are properly shielded. But even so, their
own antennas are transparent at the frequency of interest so something
has to be leaking out.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
>> On 2011-11-20 15:47 , Richard Owlett wrote:
>>> SNICKER
>>> or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
>>> some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
>>> or to paraphrase P.T. Barnum - You could detect some of the receivers
>>> some of the time, but not all the receivers all of the time.
>> Unhelpful attitude, wrong attribution and you top post.
> OK, bottom posted.
> There is not any way to guarantee detection of a properly shielded GPS
> receiver by its emissions.
> There is not any way to guarantee detection of a properly shielded GPS
> receiver by its emissions.
I doubt most GPS receivers are properly shielded. But even so, their
own antennas are transparent at the frequency of interest so something
has to be leaking out.
--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.
- GPS receiver
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-02-28









> GPS receiver from a distance of 1 - 2 metres (required), 5 metres
> (desired)? I would imagine that a high gain antenna would make it
> possible (without detecting actual GPS since it is 'in the noise').
> Are there other aspects about a GPS receiver that would make them
> detectable at that distance?
> Would it tend to false positive on other near clocks/harmonics
> (computers operate in the L1 region too). Would a narrow enough filter
> prevent that?
> With all the indiscriminate tracking (by police - re: USSC case, and
> possibly other people trying to track someone) there could be quite a
> market for such a detector. Find it and remove it. Better yet attach it
> to a city bus.
> And it would be legal (vice a jammer).