
- Best-handheld-Hiking-GPS
- 08-20-2005
![]() Re: Best handheld Hiking GPS?
| Fred Hiltz | 08-20-2005 |
![]() Re: Best handheld Hiking GPS?
| GSV Three Minds... | 08-20-2005 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I'm new to newsgroups, so I apologize in advance if I'm not following the
proper protocol . . . but I was told this was a great place to ask for input
on picking a handheld gps.
My priorities, from highest to lowest, are:
accuracy
great reception
lightweight
sync with my computer
lots of memory
good road mapping
readable screen
Anything around $500-600 is fine. I wouldn't want to spend over $1000
Any suggestions?
Are there existing reviews that I should read?
I have read good things about Garmin 60c and 76CS but it looks like the
accuracy of those is suspect.
Thanks in advance for any advice, etc.
Bill
Bill Lawrence wrote:
I don't know where you got that last idea. The accuracies of all
modern consumer GPSRs are similar. Ionospheric propagation effects
dominate their error budgets. For great reception, be sure to get a
model that accepts an external antenna and use one whenever
anything--such as your body--blocks a complete view of the sky.
Do spend some time at http://gpsinformation.net/ reading about the
error budget, specifications and reviews of almost every consumer
GPSR, software, maps, and links to everything else GPS.
The common advice is to pick the maps that suit you best, then
examine the hardware of that manufacturer's line for the features
you want. Then pick a vendor on service, price, and reputation.
--
Fred Hiltz, fhiltz at yahoo dot com
>I'm new to newsgroups, so I apologize in advance if I'm not following the
>proper protocol . . . but I was told this was a great place to ask for input
>on picking a handheld gps.
>My priorities, from highest to lowest, are:
>accuracy
>great reception
>lightweight
>sync with my computer
>lots of memory
>good road mapping
>readable screen
>Anything around $500-600 is fine. I wouldn't want to spend over $1000
>Any suggestions?
>Are there existing reviews that I should read?
>proper protocol . . . but I was told this was a great place to ask for input
>on picking a handheld gps.
>My priorities, from highest to lowest, are:
>accuracy
>great reception
>lightweight
>sync with my computer
>lots of memory
>good road mapping
>readable screen
>Anything around $500-600 is fine. I wouldn't want to spend over $1000
>Any suggestions?
>Are there existing reviews that I should read?
You need to read all the reviews and stuff at
http://www.gpsinformation.net/
Then use google (groups) to review past discussions here .. this is an
FAQ and (many) people have already contributed all they know / think /
feel.
>I have read good things about Garmin 60c and 76CS but it looks like the
>accuracy of those is suspect.
>accuracy of those is suspect.
? Afaict The accuracy of those is as good as any other consumer unit
(better if you add a Gilsson external antenna). However there are
definitely lighter models, models better designed for in-car use, and
models with more memory.
--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
Contact recommends the use of Firefox; SC recommends it at gunpoint.
- Best all around GPS?
- Global Positioning System
- 2005-09-29
- GPS map software for a laptop
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2012-05-14
- Best handheld in forested area
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-08-30
- Which handheld GPS?
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-01-18
- Best GPS for Car
- Global Positioning System
- 2009-12-23




> following the proper protocol . . . but I was told this was a
> great place to ask for input on picking a handheld gps.
> My priorities, from highest to lowest, are:
> accuracy
> great reception
> lightweight
> sync with my computer
> lots of memory
> good road mapping
> readable screen
> Anything around $500-600 is fine. I wouldn't want to spend over
> $1000
> Any suggestions?
> Are there existing reviews that I should read?
> I have read good things about Garmin 60c and 76CS but it looks
> like the accuracy of those is suspect.