Bookmark this page: Add Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA to Yahoo MyWeb Add Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA to Google Bookmarks Add Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA to Windows Live Add Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA to Del.icio.us Digg Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA! Add Re  MapSend Topo 3D USA vs MapSend Direct USA to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by David Rickon on October 28, 2007, 7:55 pm


Jack,

Many thanks for your informative comments. I have a much better
understanding of the features of both Mapsend products

Thanks, Dave
> David Rickon wrote:
>> I just purchased the hand held Magellan Meridian Color.
>> Can anyone using the two current versions of MapSend TOPO 3D USA and
>> MapSend Direct Route USA give me a comparison of the features of each.
>> Since MS Topo also has street & POI detail, how does this differ from MS
>> DirectRoute USA?
> You cannot autoroute from point to point on the data (streets/POI) with
> Topo 3D DetailMap, autorouting only works when your DetailMap is a
> DirectRoute map.
>> I would imagine MS DirectRoute does not have the topo detail that MS Topo
>> 3 D has.
> That is correct, no unimproved roads, no terrain contours, no creeks, etc.
> Pretty much a world empty of details other than streets, roads, towns, and
> major geographical details.
>> I understand MS Direct USA provides audible tones nearing turns that
>> Topo does not provide.
> It has a "Beeper" (in the Setup menu) that can be turned on and off for
> keystrokes and/or alarms. I tested it with keystrokes and found it to be
> of no use for me because I'm pretty hard of hearing. If I was using it
> anywhere with much background noise, I doubt that I would ever hear it.
>> Other than those differences. are map details the same?
> Topo 3D has better detail on secondary roads, unimproved roads, creeks,
> small rivers, and other things typically found on topo maps and not street
> maps. How much data? It is hard to quantify. It is less data than would
> be found on a 1:24,000 USGS topo map but more than on a 1:100,000 map. It
> looks to me like the topo mapping detail is best described as somewhere in
> between the two.
> All things considered, I like the amount of detail as seen on the Topo 3D
> maps. It seems to satisfy most of my needs most of the time. Using a
> Meridian with a Topo 3D DetailMap and having all the attendant features
> that come with the GPS is a great thing off road/in the woods. In some
> areas, I would also want to have a paper USGS 1:24K topo map with me for
> reference, additional details, and backup.
> If you have not figured it out yet, you have two map choices. The primary
> (Basemap) is always active, it cannot be turned off. The secondary map
> (DetailMap) can be a DirectRoute, Topo 3D, or BlueNav map. It can be
> turned off.
> With the Basemap and a DirectRoute map active, changing from Land to
> Marine use in the Map Setup menu changes the color of bodies of water from
> dark blue to light blue, making waypoints and marks on water easier to
> see.
> Changing from Land to Marine with a topo map active does not appear to
> change anything, bodies of water are dark blue and waypoints and marks
> located on bodies of water are a little harder to see. This is
> unfortunate, it would ideally change the water color for all DetailMaps.
> As it happens, the data in Topo 3D is newer than the data in DirectRoute.
> I can tell that because my street (a recent extension added to an older
> street) is shown and correctly named on Topo 3D but is missing on
> DirectRoute.
>> I am more interested in the outdoor features offered by Topo than the
>> travel features offered by MS Direct.
> I think a Meridian with Topo 3D is a real asset for outdoor/off road use.
> Street and eBay prices on Topo 3D can get down around $70, I consider that
> a good buy (the MSRP is $149).
> Jack
> --
> Jack Erbes in Ellsworth, Maine, USA - jackerbes at adelphia dot net
> (also receiving email at jacker at midmaine.com)



Posted by Jack Erbes on October 29, 2007, 9:22 am


David Rickon wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Many thanks for your informative comments. I have a much better
> understanding of the features of both Mapsend products
>
> Thanks, Dave

You're more than welcome. I still look back on my time with the
Meridians and those softwares fondly.

I've since moved on to a Garmin 76Cx simply because Magellan did not
stay competitive on hardware and software features. But I would like to
see Magellan get back into the market and threaten Garmin's market
share, it would be good for consumers and that is also the thing the
keeps bringing us better GPS receivers.

Jack

--
Jack Erbes in Ellsworth, Maine, USA - jackerbes at adelphia dot net
(also receiving email at jacker at midmaine.com)