
- VehicleHandheld
- 05-06-2006
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-06-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| David Lesher | 05-13-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-13-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-13-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| David Lesher | 05-14-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-14-2006 |
![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Karen Gallagher | 05-06-2006 |
![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| nitespark | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Michael Heiming | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-07-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Terje Mathisen | 05-08-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Albert Nurick | 05-08-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Patrick Netherc... | 05-09-2006 |
![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| McTrack | 05-08-2006 |
![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Ted Edwards | 05-08-2006 |
![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Albert Nurick | 05-08-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Ted Edwards | 05-13-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Ted Edwards | 05-18-2006 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Vehicle/Hand-held
| Phil Wheeler | 05-19-2006 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi,
What area the most sensible (low end) gps navigations systems that can
be used both in the vehicle and as handhelds? Is the "Garmin
StreetPilot c320" one of them?
Thanks!
Aaron Fude
jennifereden.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Possible, but not really suited for handheld use - not pocketable,
short battery life, limited features (no trackback, etc.).
For dual-purpose use I'd think the Quest or Quest2 would be much better.
peter wrote:
> jennifereden.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>What area the most sensible (low end) gps navigations systems that can
>>be used both in the vehicle and as handhelds? Is the "Garmin
>>StreetPilot c320" one of them?
>>be used both in the vehicle and as handhelds? Is the "Garmin
>>StreetPilot c320" one of them?
>
>
> Possible, but not really suited for handheld use - not pocketable,
> short battery life, limited features (no trackback, etc.).
>
> For dual-purpose use I'd think the Quest or Quest2 would be much better.
>
>
> Possible, but not really suited for handheld use - not pocketable,
> short battery life, limited features (no trackback, etc.).
>
> For dual-purpose use I'd think the Quest or Quest2 would be much better.
>
If auto is primary with hiking secondary, Quest/Quest2 seem good choices.
If hiking is primary and auto secondary, I'd look at the 60Cx/76Cx and
family. They have SiRF Star III technology and will work better under
trees and such .. and use replacable AA cells.
My hearburn with the Quest series for hiking is the internal rechargable
Lithium Ion battery .. vs. AA cells. Not the best for a backpacking
trip, for example, but OK for dayhikes and such.
Phil
Phil Wheeler wrote:
> If hiking is primary and auto secondary, I'd look at the 60Cx/76Cx and
> family. They have SiRF Star III technology and will work better under
> trees and such .. and use replacable AA cells.
> My hearburn with the Quest series for hiking is the internal rechargable
> Lithium Ion battery .. vs. AA cells. Not the best for a backpacking
> trip, for example, but OK for dayhikes and such.
> family. They have SiRF Star III technology and will work better under
> trees and such .. and use replacable AA cells.
> My hearburn with the Quest series for hiking is the internal rechargable
> Lithium Ion battery .. vs. AA cells. Not the best for a backpacking
> trip, for example, but OK for dayhikes and such.
OTOH, the Quest is considerably lighter and smaller than the 60 models
and even more compared with the 76 series (screen sizes are the same).
And it can easily be recharged in the field using a set of AA cells -
the same ones you'd otherwise carry for the 60/76 models. I do have to
attach an adapter connector to the battery holder for this, but it's a
pretty trivial job.
The SirFIII chips in the new 60/76 models are appealing, I just wish
Garmin had put them in a lighter and smaller package.
peter wrote:
> Phil Wheeler wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>If hiking is primary and auto secondary, I'd look at the 60Cx/76Cx and
>>family. They have SiRF Star III technology and will work better under
>>trees and such .. and use replacable AA cells.
>>My hearburn with the Quest series for hiking is the internal rechargable
>>Lithium Ion battery .. vs. AA cells. Not the best for a backpacking
>>trip, for example, but OK for dayhikes and such.
>>family. They have SiRF Star III technology and will work better under
>>trees and such .. and use replacable AA cells.
>>My hearburn with the Quest series for hiking is the internal rechargable
>>Lithium Ion battery .. vs. AA cells. Not the best for a backpacking
>>trip, for example, but OK for dayhikes and such.
>
>
> OTOH, the Quest is considerably lighter and smaller than the 60 models
> and even more compared with the 76 series (screen sizes are the same).
> And it can easily be recharged in the field using a set of AA cells -
> the same ones you'd otherwise carry for the 60/76 models. I do have to
> attach an adapter connector to the battery holder for this, but it's a
> pretty trivial job.
>
> The SirFIII chips in the new 60/76 models are appealing, I just wish
> Garmin had put them in a lighter and smaller package.
>
>
> OTOH, the Quest is considerably lighter and smaller than the 60 models
> and even more compared with the 76 series (screen sizes are the same).
> And it can easily be recharged in the field using a set of AA cells -
> the same ones you'd otherwise carry for the 60/76 models. I do have to
> attach an adapter connector to the battery holder for this, but it's a
> pretty trivial job.
>
> The SirFIII chips in the new 60/76 models are appealing, I just wish
> Garmin had put them in a lighter and smaller package.
>
Quest seems a bit fragile for my taste (for hiking). And the Quest 2
has a hard drive, does it not? Again, not the way I want to hike.
Phil
- hand held units
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-09
- Can Garmin Nuvi 350 be used hand held?
- Garmin GPS
- 2006-11-22
- Batteries for hand held Dakota
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-02
- Vehicle speed on GPS
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2007-06-09









> be used both in the vehicle and as handhelds? Is the "Garmin
> StreetPilot c320" one of them?