
- TWO-SATELLITES-COLLIDE-IN-ORBIT
- 02-11-2009
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Charlie Hoffpau... | 02-11-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-13-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Charlie Hoffpau... | 02-14-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-14-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Harald Hanche-O... | 02-14-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-15-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Uwe Hercksen | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Richard Owlett | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Richard Owlett | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Sam Wormley | 02-14-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Hans-Georg Mich... | 02-22-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Sam Wormley | 02-14-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Sam Wormley | 02-15-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-15-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Uwe Hercksen | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| GSV Three Minds... | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| GSV Three Minds... | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-21-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Hans-Georg Mich... | 02-22-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-18-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Robert Maas, ht... | 02-25-2009 |
![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Sam Wormley | 02-17-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| J. J. Lodder | 02-23-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Roy Lewallen | 02-23-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Rolf T. Kappe | 02-24-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Robert Maas, ht... | 02-25-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Roy Lewallen | 02-25-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
| Gene E. Bloch | 02-23-2009 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
-------------------------------
In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
officials said today.
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
wrote (with clarity & insight):
Is this not something that's anticipated & calculated? Why track all
this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
that this event was expected...what's up?
wrote:
>wrote (with clarity & insight):
>>TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
>>-------------------------------
>>In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>officials said today.
>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>>-------------------------------
>>In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>officials said today.
>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>Is this not something that's anticipated & calculated? Why track all
>this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>that this event was expected...what's up?
>this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>that this event was expected...what's up?
Well, maybe it WAS expected. It's not like anyone could do anything
about it.
--
Charlie Hoffpauir
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~charlieh/
Charlie Hoffpauir wrote:
> wrote:
>
>
>> wrote (with clarity & insight):
>>> TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
>>> -------------------------------
>>> In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>> satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>> other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>> officials said today.
>>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>>> -------------------------------
>>> In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>> satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>> other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>> officials said today.
>>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>> Is this not something that's anticipated & calculated? Why track all
>> this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>> that this event was expected...what's up?
>> this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>> that this event was expected...what's up?
>
> Well, maybe it WAS expected. It's not like anyone could do anything
> about it.
>
>
They move Dish network and DirectTV satellites don't they?
> Well, maybe it WAS expected. It's not like anyone could do anything
> about it.
>
>
> wrote:
>>wrote (with clarity & insight):
>>>TWO SATELLITES COLLIDE IN ORBIT
>>>-------------------------------
>>>In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>>satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>>other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>>officials said today.
>>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>>>-------------------------------
>>>In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>>>satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>>>other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>>>officials said today.
>>> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/
>>Is this not something that's anticipated & calculated? Why track all
>>this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>>that this event was expected...what's up?
>>this stuff if they can't/don't predict collisions? There's no mention
>>that this event was expected...what's up?
> Well, maybe it WAS expected. It's not like anyone could do anything
> about it.
> about it.
Not true at all, most LEO satellites would be flown the entire time they are
in orbit, they have to be otherwise they would only last a short time and
that would end up very expensive.
Mind you that siad even with the huge number of objects in orbit there is an
aweful lot of space up there and you only have to just miss everything else.
- Galileo Budget and Schedule
- Satellite Navigation
- 2011-06-22
- thoughts on geosynchronous polar orbit
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-07-30









>-------------------------------
>In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications
>satellite and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos satellite ran into each
>other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage,
>officials said today.
> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/11iridium/