Bookmark this page:
- SiRF-III-is-sensitivity-better-than-accuracy
- 05-10-2007
  Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| Andreas van Hoo... | 05-10-2007 |
 Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| laura halliday | 05-10-2007 |
  Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| David L. Wilson | 05-12-2007 |
  Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| laura halliday | 05-12-2007 |
| Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| David L. Wilson | 05-13-2007 |
| Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| laura halliday | 05-13-2007 |
| Re: SiRF III: is sensitivity better than accuracy?
| laura halliday | 05-15-2007 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Interesting how youtube makes something simple into something
> complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
> complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
While I consider Flash to be the enemy of all that is
free and right and holy, not to mention Just Plain Wrong,
I accept that YouTube have way more disk space
and net bandwidth than I do.
Please do not invent issues where there are none.
Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre
Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte
> > > I've just uploaded an animation of GPS fixes to
> > > The MPEG encoding shows some artifacts, but it will
> > > do for 5 minutes work. :-)
> > > The MPEG encoding shows some artifacts, but it will
> > > do for 5 minutes work. :-)
> > Interesting how youtube makes something simple into something
> > complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> > can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
> > complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> > can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
> While I consider Flash to be the enemy of all that is
> free and right and holy, not to mention Just Plain Wrong,
> I accept that YouTube have way more disk space
> and net bandwidth than I do.
> Please do not invent issues where there are none.
> free and right and holy, not to mention Just Plain Wrong,
> I accept that YouTube have way more disk space
> and net bandwidth than I do.
> Please do not invent issues where there are none.
Although I am an engineer, I really don't invent a lot. Certainly I
am not trying to invent "issues". I can't view your video because I
don't use Flash. If you need bandwidth or diskspace, all you had to
do was ask. I have more of both than I need and would be happy to
upload your files or even give you a space you can upload to using
FTP. Interested?
> > > > I've just uploaded an animation of GPS fixes to
> > > > The MPEG encoding shows some artifacts, but it will
> > > > do for 5 minutes work. :-)
> > > Interesting how youtube makes something simple into something
> > > complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> > > can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
> > > > The MPEG encoding shows some artifacts, but it will
> > > > do for 5 minutes work. :-)
> > > Interesting how youtube makes something simple into something
> > > complex. Even if you have a dozen programs to play mpeg files, you
> > > can't watch them on youtube if you don't have flash.
> > While I consider Flash to be the enemy of all that is
> > free and right and holy, not to mention Just Plain Wrong,
> > I accept that YouTube have way more disk space
> > and net bandwidth than I do.
> > Please do not invent issues where there are none.
> > free and right and holy, not to mention Just Plain Wrong,
> > I accept that YouTube have way more disk space
> > and net bandwidth than I do.
> > Please do not invent issues where there are none.
> Although I am an engineer, I really don't invent a lot. Certainly I
> am not trying to invent "issues". I can't view your video because I
> don't use Flash. If you need bandwidth or diskspace, all you had to
> do was ask. I have more of both than I need and would be happy to
> upload your files or even give you a space you can upload to using
> FTP. Interested?- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
> am not trying to invent "issues". I can't view your video because I
> don't use Flash. If you need bandwidth or diskspace, all you had to
> do was ask. I have more of both than I need and would be happy to
> upload your files or even give you a space you can upload to using
> FTP. Interested?- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
the YouTube thing was fine.... I thought... ... as funky as
computers and software are, in general... each of us can have our own
views/preferences of what we like and do not like... but we don't need
to convince others that their choices .. in terms of how to share
something... create problems for us.. because we have different
preferences of what we would like on our own machines...
If someone offers to share something... accept it graciously ... or
not .... graciously...
:-)
David L. Wilson wrote:
>
>> I assume this is "normal" for the 76csx... but to be honest.. even
>> though I've used the track log capability on the basic etrex and the
>> Rino.. I've not noticed this before.
>> though I've used the track log capability on the basic etrex and the
>> Rino.. I've not noticed this before.
>
> It is normal.
>
> Also, s problem with looking at plotted track logs is that one cannot see
> the points that are on top of points. One tends to notice more the rare
> extreme errors and notice less the higher probabilites of small errors.
> It is normal.
>
> Also, s problem with looking at plotted track logs is that one cannot see
> the points that are on top of points. One tends to notice more the rare
> extreme errors and notice less the higher probabilites of small errors.
MapSource is not a very good program for looking at tracks with. It is
okay for seeing your travel on the Garmin mapping and it does an okay
job on calculating speeds and elapsed times and distances.
Beyond that, you might want to try some of the third party applications
that are much more capable at distinguishing individual track points and
other details. There are several good ones here, both freewares and
sharewares:
http://gpsinformation.net/#3rdparty
My personal favorite is GPS Utility:
http://www.gpsu.co.uk/
Jack
> David L. Wilson wrote:
> >> I assume this is "normal" for the 76csx... but to be honest.. even
> >> though I've used the track log capability on the basic etrex and the
> >> Rino.. I've not noticed this before.
> >> though I've used the track log capability on the basic etrex and the
> >> Rino.. I've not noticed this before.
> > It is normal.
> > Also, s problem with looking at plotted track logs is that one cannot see
> > the points that are on top of points. One tends to notice more the rare
> > extreme errors and notice less the higher probabilites of small errors.
> > Also, s problem with looking at plotted track logs is that one cannot see
> > the points that are on top of points. One tends to notice more the rare
> > extreme errors and notice less the higher probabilites of small errors.
> MapSource is not a very good program for looking at tracks with. It is
> okay for seeing your travel on the Garmin mapping and it does an okay
> job on calculating speeds and elapsed times and distances.
> Beyond that, you might want to try some of the third party applications
> that are much more capable at distinguishing individual track points and
> other details. There are several good ones here, both freewares and
> sharewares:
> http://gpsinformation.net/#3rdparty
> My personal favorite is GPS Utility:
> http://www.gpsu.co.uk/
> Jack
> okay for seeing your travel on the Garmin mapping and it does an okay
> job on calculating speeds and elapsed times and distances.
> Beyond that, you might want to try some of the third party applications
> that are much more capable at distinguishing individual track points and
> other details. There are several good ones here, both freewares and
> sharewares:
> http://gpsinformation.net/#3rdparty
> My personal favorite is GPS Utility:
> http://www.gpsu.co.uk/
> Jack
Jack - I had looked at this and others but they did not appear to use
maps....
right now I'm using NG TOPO... backroad and mid Atlantic ..... how
would the NG
software compare to the GPS utility software?
> > The MPEG encoding shows some artifacts, but it will
> > do for 5 minutes work. :-)