Bookmark this page: Add PDA software and maps   Australia to Yahoo MyWeb Add PDA software and maps   Australia to Google Bookmarks Add PDA software and maps   Australia to Windows Live Add PDA software and maps   Australia to Del.icio.us Digg PDA software and maps   Australia! Add PDA software and maps   Australia to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Cider Monster on May 29, 2006, 4:25 am


Hi,

I've recently been given a bluetooth GPS receiver and already have a
Windows Mobile 5 PDA. Any of you knowledgeable people out there have any
suggestions on what software and maps to use for in-car street-level
navigation around NSW and beyond?

Thanks.

Posted by Graham Fountain on May 29, 2006, 5:02 am


Cider Monster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently been given a bluetooth GPS receiver and already have a
> Windows Mobile 5 PDA. Any of you knowledgeable people out there have any
> suggestions on what software and maps to use for in-car street-level
> navigation around NSW and beyond?
Personally, I wouldn't buy anything just now. Give it a month or two,
and the new version of Sensis maps should be out, which hopefully will
be significantly better than the garbage they are peddling now.
Once that happens, TomTom is probably the easiest to use, while CoPilot
is arguably the most powerful. For example CoPilot can do multi-route
trips with destination order optimisation, and can also accept locations
entered by latitude and longitude. However it's user interface is a
little ordinary, and to my mind it looks ugly. TomTom looks pretty, is
very easy to use and fast to enter locations, but is missing a few of
the more powerful features such as multi-destination optimisations. I
haven't had a good look at destinator to get a feel for it's power, but
it's user interface also looks very clunky like CoPilot's. Navman's UI
is a little better than Copilot and Destinator, but is not as easy as
TomTom, and also lacks the more advanced features of Copilot.
The one big ease of use benefit of TomTom is that when entering towns it
brings up big letters on the screen, and it's menu options are also big,
so you can do pretty much everything by touching your finger on the
screen. The three others require you to use the normal pocket-pc typing
methods - pop up keyboard, graffiti, transcriber etc - so you must use
your stylus to enter anything.
All of the programs use the same maps, so mapping detail is identical.
Currently this is pretty ordinary, hopefully the new maps to be released
shortly will address this (at least partially).
>
> Thanks.

Posted by BarnOwl on May 31, 2006, 9:20 am



What a misguided load of crap !!!

> Cider Monster wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've recently been given a bluetooth GPS receiver and already have a
>> Windows Mobile 5 PDA. Any of you knowledgeable people out there have any
>> suggestions on what software and maps to use for in-car street-level
>> navigation around NSW and beyond?
> Personally, I wouldn't buy anything just now. Give it a month or two, and
> the new version of Sensis maps should be out, which hopefully will be
> significantly better than the garbage they are peddling now.
> Once that happens, TomTom is probably the easiest to use, while CoPilot is
> arguably the most powerful. For example CoPilot can do multi-route trips
> with destination order optimisation, and can also accept locations entered
> by latitude and longitude. However it's user interface is a little
> ordinary, and to my mind it looks ugly. TomTom looks pretty, is very easy
> to use and fast to enter locations, but is missing a few of the more
> powerful features such as multi-destination optimisations. I haven't had a
> good look at destinator to get a feel for it's power, but it's user
> interface also looks very clunky like CoPilot's. Navman's UI is a little
> better than Copilot and Destinator, but is not as easy as TomTom, and also
> lacks the more advanced features of Copilot.
> The one big ease of use benefit of TomTom is that when entering towns it
> brings up big letters on the screen, and it's menu options are also big,
> so you can do pretty much everything by touching your finger on the
> screen. The three others require you to use the normal pocket-pc typing
> methods - pop up keyboard, graffiti, transcriber etc - so you must use
> your stylus to enter anything.
> All of the programs use the same maps, so mapping detail is identical.
> Currently this is pretty ordinary, hopefully the new maps to be released
> shortly will address this (at least partially).
>> Thanks.



Posted by brian@gpsoz.com.au on June 1, 2006, 3:13 am


Hi Graham,

Which bit do you think is misguided? He's said a lot.

BarnOwl wrote:
> What a misguided load of crap !!!
> > Cider Monster wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I've recently been given a bluetooth GPS receiver and already have a
> >> Windows Mobile 5 PDA. Any of you knowledgeable people out there have any
> >> suggestions on what software and maps to use for in-car street-level
> >> navigation around NSW and beyond?
> > Personally, I wouldn't buy anything just now. Give it a month or two, and
> > the new version of Sensis maps should be out, which hopefully will be
> > significantly better than the garbage they are peddling now.
> > Once that happens, TomTom is probably the easiest to use, while CoPilot is
> > arguably the most powerful. For example CoPilot can do multi-route trips
> > with destination order optimisation, and can also accept locations entered
> > by latitude and longitude. However it's user interface is a little
> > ordinary, and to my mind it looks ugly. TomTom looks pretty, is very easy
> > to use and fast to enter locations, but is missing a few of the more
> > powerful features such as multi-destination optimisations. I haven't had a
> > good look at destinator to get a feel for it's power, but it's user
> > interface also looks very clunky like CoPilot's. Navman's UI is a little
> > better than Copilot and Destinator, but is not as easy as TomTom, and also
> > lacks the more advanced features of Copilot.
> > The one big ease of use benefit of TomTom is that when entering towns it
> > brings up big letters on the screen, and it's menu options are also big,
> > so you can do pretty much everything by touching your finger on the
> > screen. The three others require you to use the normal pocket-pc typing
> > methods - pop up keyboard, graffiti, transcriber etc - so you must use
> > your stylus to enter anything.
> > All of the programs use the same maps, so mapping detail is identical.
> > Currently this is pretty ordinary, hopefully the new maps to be released
> > shortly will address this (at least partially).
> >> Thanks.