
- Garmin-GPSmap-76Csx-vs-60Csx
- 02-02-2007
![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| Bert Hyman | 02-02-2007 |
![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| Heinrich Pfeife... | 02-02-2007 |
![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| Jack Erbes | 02-02-2007 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| Jack Erbes | 02-03-2007 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| John William Hu... | 02-05-2007 |
![]() Re: Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx
| Peter Wilkins | 02-04-2007 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello,
My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip;
and x = removable data card.
Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
other than the package configuration? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product
function, and there does not appear to me any significant functional
difference between the two models. What am I missing?
OliverS
zoar1951-_nospam_news@yahoo.com (OliverS) wrote in
Not quite.
The 60/76Cx and 60/76CSx both have SiRF-III receivers, but the
60/76CSx has the barometer and magnetic compass.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com
> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product function,
> and there does not appear to me any significant functional difference
> between the two models. What am I missing?
> OliverS
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product function,
> and there does not appear to me any significant functional difference
> between the two models. What am I missing?
> OliverS
S = Sensors :
Altitude
Compass
> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.
no: S = Sensors (magnetic compass and barometric altimeter).
--
Heinrich
http://www.gartrip.de
mail: new<at>gartrip.de
OliverS wrote:
> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip;
> and x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product
> function, and there does not appear to me any significant functional
> difference between the two models. What am I missing?
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip;
> and x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product
> function, and there does not appear to me any significant functional
> difference between the two models. What am I missing?
Not much. The 76Csx comes with a larger SD card; the 60Csx looks sexier.
You'd probably want to stick a larger capacity card in either model anyway.
Apart from looks, they probably perform as well as each other - although
personally I still prefer an antenna which is (at least partially) clear of
the main body, as in the 60Csx. I would imagine that when using the 76Csx,
hands messing about at or near the top of the unit, pushing buttons etc.,
*may* be a very slight disadvantage in woodland.
http://www.garmin.com/products/manual.jsp?product=010-00422-00
http://www.garmin.com/products/manual.jsp?product=010-00469-00
From a quick flick through the manuals, I can't see any functional
differences.
--
Arecibo
- garmin GPSMAP 76csx - diagnostic mode
- Garmin GPS
- 2006-02-26
- GPSMap 76CSx "find" using lat/lon?
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-05-30
- GPSMap 76CSx mounts?
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-05-19
- Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-10-03
- Point accuracy with Garmin 76csx
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-18









> chip; and x = removable data card.