Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx to Yahoo MyWeb Add Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx to Google Bookmarks Add Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx to Windows Live Add Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx to Del.icio.us Digg Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx! Add Garmin GPSmap 76Csx vs 60Csx to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by OliverS on February 2, 2007, 9:35 am


Hello,

My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.

I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip;
and x = removable data card.

Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
other than the package configuration? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.

I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product
function, and there does not appear to me any significant functional
difference between the two models. What am I missing?

OliverS

Posted by Bert Hyman on February 2, 2007, 9:41 am


zoar1951-_nospam_news@yahoo.com (OliverS) wrote in

> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III
> chip; and x = removable data card.

Not quite.

The 60/76Cx and 60/76CSx both have SiRF-III receivers, but the
60/76CSx has the barometer and magnetic compass.

--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com

Posted by Jan on February 2, 2007, 9:58 am



> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product function,
> and there does not appear to me any significant functional difference
> between the two models. What am I missing?
> OliverS


S = Sensors :
Altitude
Compass




Posted by Heinrich Pfeifer on February 2, 2007, 10:00 am



> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip; and
> x = removable data card.

no: S = Sensors (magnetic compass and barometric altimeter).


--

Heinrich
http://www.gartrip.de
mail: new<at>gartrip.de



Posted by Arecibo on February 2, 2007, 10:16 am



OliverS wrote:

> Hello,
> My thanks to those who answered my other comparison questions.
> I think I have learned Garmin's coding: C = color; s = SiRF-III chip;
> and x = removable data card.
> Now, is there any difference between the 76Csx and the 60 Csx models,
> other than the package configuration? What are the
> advantages/disadvantages to the different configurations.
> I have checked the Garmin web site and used the compare product
> function, and there does not appear to me any significant functional
> difference between the two models. What am I missing?

Not much. The 76Csx comes with a larger SD card; the 60Csx looks sexier.
You'd probably want to stick a larger capacity card in either model anyway.
Apart from looks, they probably perform as well as each other - although
personally I still prefer an antenna which is (at least partially) clear of
the main body, as in the 60Csx. I would imagine that when using the 76Csx,
hands messing about at or near the top of the unit, pushing buttons etc.,
*may* be a very slight disadvantage in woodland.

http://www.garmin.com/products/manual.jsp?product=010-00422-00
http://www.garmin.com/products/manual.jsp?product=010-00469-00

From a quick flick through the manuals, I can't see any functional
differences.

--
Arecibo



Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>