Bookmark this page: Add Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF to Yahoo MyWeb Add Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF to Google Bookmarks Add Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF to Windows Live Add Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF to Del.icio.us Digg Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF! Add Clarification of Parkinson Remarks on Block IIF to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Mike Jr on June 4, 2009, 9:18 pm


Parkinson states that GPS World misunderstood his remarks.

http://sidt.gpsworld.com/gpssidt/Latest+News/Clarification-of-Parkinson-Rem=
arks-on-Block-IIF/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/601500?contextCategoryId=
=3D1385

Brad Parkinson, speaking from the Joint Navigation Conference,
emphasized that he is =93a strong supporter of GPS IIF continuing for
the first 12 vehicles.=94

=93The GPS World interpretation of my remarks to GAO has created some
misunderstandings. I wish to make it clear that I am a strong
supporter of GPS IIF continuing for the first 12 vehicles. The next
subsequent step is IIIA, which will meet the modernized requirements
of additional signal power, the new international signal and rapid
updates using OCX. I am definitely not in favor of abandoning the IIF
line, which we desperately need. I have been a strong and constructive
supporter of solving the IIF problems and, as rapidly as prudent,
launching them to meet the Air Force need for space assets.=94

--Mike Jr

Posted by Sam Wormley on June 5, 2009, 1:01 am


Mike Jr wrote:
> Parkinson states that GPS World misunderstood his remarks.
>=20
> http://sidt.gpsworld.com/gpssidt/Latest+News/Clarification-of-Parkinson=
-Remarks-on-Block-IIF/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/601500?contextCatego=
ryId=3D1385
>=20
> Brad Parkinson, speaking from the Joint Navigation Conference,
> emphasized that he is =93a strong supporter of GPS IIF continuing for
> the first 12 vehicles.=94
>=20
> =93The GPS World interpretation of my remarks to GAO has created some
> misunderstandings. I wish to make it clear that I am a strong
> supporter of GPS IIF continuing for the first 12 vehicles. The next
> subsequent step is IIIA, which will meet the modernized requirements
> of additional signal power, the new international signal and rapid
> updates using OCX. I am definitely not in favor of abandoning the IIF
> line, which we desperately need. I have been a strong and constructive
> supporter of solving the IIF problems and, as rapidly as prudent,
> launching them to meet the Air Force need for space assets.=94
>=20
> --Mike Jr

Thanks Mike