
- Update-on-DC-aerial-image-censorship
- 03-03-2008
![]() ![]() Re: Update on DC aerial image censorship
| Russell Patters... | 03-03-2008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Update on DC aerial image censorship
| Spamm Trappe | 03-03-2008 |
![]() ![]() Re: Update on DC aerial image censorship
| C J Campbell | 03-03-2008 |
![]() ![]() Re: Update on DC aerial image censorship
| David Lesher | 03-03-2008 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
It's just about impossible to prevent these kinds of photos from being
taken. Banning planes from flying over the buildings doesn't help
because a plane doesn't have to be directly overhead to take an aerial
photo. And even if you make it a no-fly zone for miles around, there
are still satellite photos which can have a surprisingly good
resolution.
JamesStep@gmail.com wrote:
shhhh... somebody may believe you, they'll go wake up Cheney to tell
him all about it, and he'll piss in his knickers before he gets out of bed.
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
>> If a Google Earth aerial photo needs to be "scrubbed" then there's a
>> huge vulnerability that allowed it to be taken in the first place
>> huge vulnerability that allowed it to be taken in the first place
>
> It's just about impossible to prevent these kinds of photos from being
> taken. Banning planes from flying over the buildings doesn't help
> because a plane doesn't have to be directly overhead to take an aerial
> photo. And even if you make it a no-fly zone for miles around, there
> are still satellite photos which can have a surprisingly good
> resolution.
> It's just about impossible to prevent these kinds of photos from being
> taken. Banning planes from flying over the buildings doesn't help
> because a plane doesn't have to be directly overhead to take an aerial
> photo. And even if you make it a no-fly zone for miles around, there
> are still satellite photos which can have a surprisingly good
> resolution.
shhhh... somebody may believe you, they'll go wake up Cheney to tell
him all about it, and he'll piss in his knickers before he gets out of bed.
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
>Utter nonsense. What security experts call "security theaters". Great
>movie plot material (and obviously derived from over exposure to the
>same), but useless in any practical context outside the entertainment
>industry.
>movie plot material (and obviously derived from over exposure to the
>same), but useless in any practical context outside the entertainment
>industry.
>If a Google Earth aerial photo needs to be "scrubbed" then there's a
>huge vulnerability that allowed it to be taken in the first place.
>huge vulnerability that allowed it to be taken in the first place.
We can just shoot down all the SPOT and other foreign birds that
go by.
ps: Where do people think Google/MSN/etc buy their images from?
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
- Garmin Map Update
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-05-29
- XL IQ, update
- Tomtom GPS
- 2012-02-05
- Favorites trashed on map update
- Tomtom GPS
- 2011-11-24
- Nuvi 760 latest map update
- Garmin GPS
- 2012-02-22
- Trouble with map update? -- RESOLVED
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-11-08
- Image pan-sharpening software HighView FREE for non-commercial use
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
- 2011-09-30
- download map update - 1 yr avail ?
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-08-09









> huge vulnerability that allowed it to be taken in the first place