Bookmark this page: Add Transverse Mercator formulae to Yahoo MyWeb Add Transverse Mercator formulae to Google Bookmarks Add Transverse Mercator formulae to Windows Live Add Transverse Mercator formulae to Del.icio.us Digg Transverse Mercator formulae! Add Transverse Mercator formulae to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Paul Cooper on February 22, 2008, 12:37 pm
I am working on implementing the formulae for Transverse Mercator in a
Java Map Projection Package. I have implemented the formulae given on
pp 60- 64 of Snyder (1987) , Map Projections - A Working Manual.
However, these are not accurate beyond 5-10 degrees from the central
meridian. I have also found the paper referenced by Snyder as "Army,
1962" that gives more terms for the equations; I haven't tried it yet
but it only claims accuracy to 24 degrees.

However, both these document only Taylor expansions of the original
unclosed equations, and do not give the "open" forms of the equations,
stating that they are of little practical use because they converge
too slowly.

These days, I wonder if this is true! Processing power is far greater
than it was in 1987, and I would like to have a go at implementing an
iterative solution using the basic "open" form of the equations, in
the same manner as I usually do for other projections. Here we hit a
snag, though - I don't have a reference for them; everyone seems just
to give series based solutions. Can someone point me in the right
direction?

It seems to me that as long as I have a form that converges, it is
unlikely that it would be so slow as to be unuseable in the
environment I am working in, and it would be far more accurate.

Thanks

Paul Cooper
------------ And now a word from our sponsor ------------------
Do your users want the best web-email gateway? Don't let your
customers drift off to free webmail services install your own
web gateway!
-- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_webmail.htm ----

Posted by user923005 on February 26, 2008, 10:10 pm
> I am working on implementing the formulae for Transverse Mercator in a
> Java Map Projection Package. I have implemented the formulae given on
> pp 60- 64 of Snyder (1987) , Map Projections - A Working Manual.
> However, these are not accurate beyond 5-10 degrees from the central
> meridian. =A0I have also found the paper referenced by Snyder as "Army,
> 1962" that gives more terms for the equations; I haven't tried it yet
> but it only claims accuracy to 24 degrees.
> However, both these document only Taylor expansions of the original
> unclosed equations, and do not give the "open" forms of the equations,
> stating that they are of little practical use because they converge
> too slowly.
> These days, I wonder if this is true! Processing power is far greater
> than it was in 1987, and I would like to have a go at implementing an
> iterative solution using the basic "open" form of the equations, in
> the same manner as I usually do for other projections. Here we hit a
> snag, though - I don't have a reference for them; everyone seems just
> to give series based solutions. Can someone point me in the right
> direction?
> It seems to me that as long as I have a form that converges, it is
> unlikely that it would be so slow as to be unuseable in the
> environment I am working in, and it would be far more accurate.

Maybe this is helpful:
http://www.dwaf.gov.za/IWQS/gauss/gauss.html

Posted by Paul Cooper on February 27, 2008, 5:01 am
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:10:30 -0800 (PST), user923005

>> I am working on implementing the formulae for Transverse Mercator in a
>> Java Map Projection Package. I have implemented the formulae given on
>> pp 60- 64 of Snyder (1987) , Map Projections - A Working Manual.
>> However, these are not accurate beyond 5-10 degrees from the central
>> meridian.  I have also found the paper referenced by Snyder as "Army,
>> 1962" that gives more terms for the equations; I haven't tried it yet
>> but it only claims accuracy to 24 degrees.
>> However, both these document only Taylor expansions of the original
>> unclosed equations, and do not give the "open" forms of the equations,
>> stating that they are of little practical use because they converge
>> too slowly.
>> These days, I wonder if this is true! Processing power is far greater
>> than it was in 1987, and I would like to have a go at implementing an
>> iterative solution using the basic "open" form of the equations, in
>> the same manner as I usually do for other projections. Here we hit a
>> snag, though - I don't have a reference for them; everyone seems just
>> to give series based solutions. Can someone point me in the right
>> direction?
>> It seems to me that as long as I have a form that converges, it is
>> unlikely that it would be so slow as to be unuseable in the
>> environment I am working in, and it would be far more accurate.
>Maybe this is helpful:
>http://www.dwaf.gov.za/IWQS/gauss/gauss.html

Thanks, I'd already found that one. It still uses Taylor expansions,
but I haven't looked at it in detail. It is a shame it is published in
HTML so it is difficult to print it all out!

Paul