
- How-many-streets-are-there-in-the-USA
- 11-29-2007
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi All,
I'm about to run through all 24GB+ of TIGER Line files and convert the
data to a different format. The size of my target data structure can
be computed as a function of the number of streets in the TIGER data.
Does anyone have a rough idea of how many streets/roads/etc. to
expect? I need to know so I can determine whether my process will have
enough virtual memory to hold the entire data structure or if I will
have to do some trickery.
TIA,
-Le Chaud Lapin-
I'm about to run through all 24GB+ of TIGER Line files and convert the
data to a different format. The size of my target data structure can
be computed as a function of the number of streets in the TIGER data.
Does anyone have a rough idea of how many streets/roads/etc. to
expect? I need to know so I can determine whether my process will have
enough virtual memory to hold the entire data structure or if I will
have to do some trickery.
TIA,
-Le Chaud Lapin-
Somewhere between 30 and 40 million streets.
> > Does anyone have a rough idea of how many streets/roads/etc. to
> > expect?
> > expect?
> Somewhere between 30 and 40 million streets.
Yup.
I just processed District of Columbia and all 50 US states except
Connecticut, because the table I copied from a US government web site
with state codes was missing CT. Unfortunately, I can't find the
link, but I am pretty certain CT was missing because I checked and
rechecked when I noticed the fault.
Anyhow, after processing DC and these 49 states, looking for cases
where census feature class code (CFCC) began with 'A', I got around
27.1 million streets, which would, indeed, make the answer 30-40
million streets if Connecticut were included, along with Puerto Rico
and U.S. territories, taking into acount that CFCC 'A' is not the only
indicator of an addressable feature.
I guess I see why people like GIS so much. There are so many data-
intensive things you can do with it, and it seems relevant to just
about everything. ;)
Much thanks.
-Le Chaud Lapin-
> I just processed District of Columbia and all 50 US states except
> Connecticut, because the table I copied from a US government web site
> with state codes was missing CT. Unfortunately, I can't find the
> link, but I am pretty certain CT was missing because I checked and
> rechecked when I noticed the fault.
> Connecticut, because the table I copied from a US government web site
> with state codes was missing CT. Unfortunately, I can't find the
> link, but I am pretty certain CT was missing because I checked and
> rechecked when I noticed the fault.
Found it: http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip55-3.htm
Look at Table 1 in this document. Notice that Connecticut is missing.
Or it could just be my misreading.
I find it hard to believe that such an important omission would be
overlooked for so long.
-Le Chaud Lapin-
> > I just processed District of Columbia and all 50 US states except
> > Connecticut, because the table I copied from a US government web site
> > with state codes was missing CT. =A0Unfortunately, I can't find the
> > link, but I am pretty certain CT was missing because I checked and
> > rechecked when I noticed the fault.
> > Connecticut, because the table I copied from a US government web site
> > with state codes was missing CT. =A0Unfortunately, I can't find the
> > link, but I am pretty certain CT was missing because I checked and
> > rechecked when I noticed the fault.
> Found it:http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip55-3.htm
> Look at Table 1 in this document. =A0Notice that Connecticut is missing.
> Or it could just be my misreading.
> I find it hard to believe that such an important omission would be
> overlooked for so long.
> Look at Table 1 in this document. =A0Notice that Connecticut is missing.
> Or it could just be my misreading.
> I find it hard to believe that such an important omission would be
> overlooked for so long.
It is not overlooked. The GNIS people have been aware of it for quite
a while. The erroneous data is simply stale and will not die. They
pointed me to the correct list at USGS:
"For the official site, go to <http://geonames.usgs.gov>; click
domestic, and then either download (scroll to FIPS 55), or click
search for interactive retrieval. "
-Le Chaud Lapin-
- TOMTOM
- Tomtom GPS
- 2011-11-25
- POI Mega File for Microsoft Streets & Trips has been updated [Apr 2010]
- Global Positioning System
- 2010-04-21
- POI Mega File for Microsoft Streets & Trips has been updated [April 2010]
- Satellite Navigation
- 2010-04-21
- Map accuracy
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2011-05-03
- Microsoft Streets and Trips
- Satellite Navigation
- 2010-02-22
- Too many choices
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2011-08-08

> expect?