
- GPS-website
- 06-04-2007
![]() Re: GPS website
| Paul Cooper | 06-05-2007 |
![]() ![]() Re: GPS website
| ujaval@gmail.co... | 06-05-2007 |
![]() ![]() Re: GPS website
| Marc Pelletier | 06-05-2007 |
![]() ![]() Re: GPS website
| Paul Cooper | 06-05-2007 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Does anybody know of a website that can tell you when the best GPS satellite
reception will be at a given location?
reception will be at a given location?
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:12:33 GMT, "Donkey Jazz"
completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
details.
Paul
completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
details.
Paul
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:12:33 GMT, "Donkey Jazz"
> >Does anybody know of a website that can tell you when the best GPS satellite
> >reception will be at a given location?
> >reception will be at a given location?
> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
> Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
> part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
> details.
> Paul
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
> Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
> part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
> details.
> Paul
You can use the Trimble Planning Software (
http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware_ts.asp
) . It's free and it can give you constellation details as well as DOP
at any time. it is used to plan the best time for survey so that the
errors are minimal and visibility maximum.
-Ujaval
http://spatialthoughts.com
> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>
Actually I was surprised to find this wasn't so just recently. In Feb of
this year we were working in Newfoundland, Canada and frequently had only 4
satellites in view above a 10° mask angle. Lowering the mask gave a better
but noisier result. We had a fix, but certainly not a good one. I'm
guessing that there were one or more satellites removed from service for
some reason, because this really is rare nowadays.
cheers
Marc Pelletier
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:17:15 -0000, Marc Pelletier
I'm surprised too - we work in Antarctica, and for the last few years
we haven't even bothered checking satellite ephemera; we always get a
post-processed result better than a centimetre anyway useing
auto-Gypsy.
Paul
>> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
>> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
>> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
>> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
>> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
>> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>>
>> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
>> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
>> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
>> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
>> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>>
>Actually I was surprised to find this wasn't so just recently. In Feb of
>this year we were working in Newfoundland, Canada and frequently had only 4
>satellites in view above a 10° mask angle. Lowering the mask gave a better
>but noisier result. We had a fix, but certainly not a good one. I'm
>guessing that there were one or more satellites removed from service for
>some reason, because this really is rare nowadays.
>cheers
>Marc Pelletier
>this year we were working in Newfoundland, Canada and frequently had only 4
>satellites in view above a 10° mask angle. Lowering the mask gave a better
>but noisier result. We had a fix, but certainly not a good one. I'm
>guessing that there were one or more satellites removed from service for
>some reason, because this really is rare nowadays.
>cheers
>Marc Pelletier
I'm surprised too - we work in Antarctica, and for the last few years
we haven't even bothered checking satellite ephemera; we always get a
post-processed result better than a centimetre anyway useing
auto-Gypsy.
Paul
- GPS, GLONASS and GALILEO ?
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-09-08
- Bluetooth GPS
- Satellite Navigation
- 2005-08-29
- Opinion about buying a Gps
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-12-15
- GPS Website Help
- Garmin GPS
- 2007-07-13







>reception will be at a given location?