Bookmark this page: Add GPS website to Yahoo MyWeb Add GPS website to Google Bookmarks Add GPS website to Windows Live Add GPS website to Del.icio.us Digg GPS website! Add GPS website to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
  |--> Re: GPS website ujaval@gmail.co...06-05-2007
  |--> Re: GPS website Marc Pelletier06-05-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Donkey Jazz on June 4, 2007, 12:12 pm
Does anybody know of a website that can tell you when the best GPS satellite
reception will be at a given location?



Posted by Paul Cooper on June 5, 2007, 6:36 am
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:12:33 GMT, "Donkey Jazz"

>Does anybody know of a website that can tell you when the best GPS satellite
>reception will be at a given location?
This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.

Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
details.

Paul

Posted by ujaval@gmail.com on June 5, 2007, 10:49 am
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:12:33 GMT, "Donkey Jazz"
> >Does anybody know of a website that can tell you when the best GPS satellite
> >reception will be at a given location?
> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
> Of course, local conditions may cause you problems due to obscuring
> part of the sky or interference, but no web-site could give you these
> details.
> Paul

You can use the Trimble Planning Software (
http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware_ts.asp
) . It's free and it can give you constellation details as well as DOP
at any time. it is used to plan the best time for survey so that the
errors are minimal and visibility maximum.

-Ujaval
http://spatialthoughts.com


Posted by Marc Pelletier on June 5, 2007, 11:17 am

> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>

Actually I was surprised to find this wasn't so just recently. In Feb of
this year we were working in Newfoundland, Canada and frequently had only 4
satellites in view above a 10° mask angle. Lowering the mask gave a better
but noisier result. We had a fix, but certainly not a good one. I'm
guessing that there were one or more satellites removed from service for
some reason, because this really is rare nowadays.

cheers

Marc Pelletier

Posted by Paul Cooper on June 5, 2007, 3:59 pm
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:17:15 -0000, Marc Pelletier

>> This is not needed and hasn't been since the constellation was
>> completed. In open country, as far as I am aware there are no
>> preferrred times; you will always have enough satellites above the
>> horizon and sufficiently widely spaced for a good fix. This is a
>> historic problem dating back to the days before the constellation was
>> complete, but it simply isn't a problem these days.
>>
>Actually I was surprised to find this wasn't so just recently. In Feb of
>this year we were working in Newfoundland, Canada and frequently had only 4
>satellites in view above a 10° mask angle. Lowering the mask gave a better
>but noisier result. We had a fix, but certainly not a good one. I'm
>guessing that there were one or more satellites removed from service for
>some reason, because this really is rare nowadays.
>cheers
>Marc Pelletier

I'm surprised too - we work in Antarctica, and for the last few years
we haven't even bothered checking satellite ephemera; we always get a
post-processed result better than a centimetre anyway useing
auto-Gypsy.

Paul