Bookmark this page: Add recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx to Yahoo MyWeb Add recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx to Google Bookmarks Add recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx to Windows Live Add recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx to Del.icio.us Digg recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx! Add recalculating multi point routes on 60Cx to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by A on May 13, 2008, 4:20 am


When my idea of how to get there disagrees with Mapsource's, I add
waypoints along the route until it does what I want.

This works well, unless the route gets recalculated - e.g. for a local
diversion - when the 60Cx ignores all of the in-between waypoints and
calculates a route from here direct to the destination!

Surely it should only recalculate the section from here to the next
waypoint, and leave the rest of the route intact?


Very irritating.

Posted by Jack Erbes on May 13, 2008, 7:44 am


A wrote:
> When my idea of how to get there disagrees with Mapsource's, I add
> waypoints along the route until it does what I want.
>
> This works well, unless the route gets recalculated - e.g. for a local
> diversion - when the 60Cx ignores all of the in-between waypoints and
> calculates a route from here direct to the destination!
>
> Surely it should only recalculate the section from here to the next
> waypoint, and leave the rest of the route intact?
>
>
> Very irritating.

Are you placing waypoints and adding those to the route in MapSource?
If not try that.

I seem to remember that automatic route recalculation for Follow Road
routes will take you to the next waypoint and through the remaining
waypoints if the route was built with waypoints in MapSource and those
were uploaded to the GPS receiver (I have a 76Cx). But that would not
happen if the via points are map points or map lines as you get when you
just click on the map to build a route.

I haven't experimented with this in a while, and I might not have this
right. I remember that if I was on a Off Road route and recalculated
it, it would take the most direct path to the last waypoint in the route
so I turned automatic recalculation off and learned that I should not
recalc routes.

Jack

--
Jack Erbes in Ellsworth, Maine, USA - jackerbes at adelphia dot net
(also receiving email at jacker at midmaine.com)

Posted by Broadback on May 13, 2008, 10:09 am


Jack Erbes wrote:
> A wrote:
>> When my idea of how to get there disagrees with Mapsource's, I add
>> waypoints along the route until it does what I want.
>> This works well, unless the route gets recalculated - e.g. for a local
>> diversion - when the 60Cx ignores all of the in-between waypoints and
>> calculates a route from here direct to the destination!
>> Surely it should only recalculate the section from here to the next
>> waypoint, and leave the rest of the route intact?
>> Very irritating.
>
> Are you placing waypoints and adding those to the route in MapSource?
> If not try that.
>
> I seem to remember that automatic route recalculation for Follow Road
> routes will take you to the next waypoint and through the remaining
> waypoints if the route was built with waypoints in MapSource and those
> were uploaded to the GPS receiver (I have a 76Cx). But that would not
> happen if the via points are map points or map lines as you get when you
> just click on the map to build a route.
>
> I haven't experimented with this in a while, and I might not have this
> right. I remember that if I was on a Off Road route and recalculated
> it, it would take the most direct path to the last waypoint in the route
> so I turned automatic recalculation off and learned that I should not
> recalc routes.
>
> Jack
>
The problem I found was when going from, say, a-b-c-d-e-f-g I got to d
then nearly at e the road was closed, my 60csx kept insisting that I go
to e, even when I had reached point f and beyond using the diversion
signs. I gave up in the end and reverted to paper!

Posted by Jack Erbes on May 13, 2008, 11:26 am


Broadback wrote:
<snip>
> The problem I found was when going from, say, a-b-c-d-e-f-g I got to d
> then nearly at e the road was closed, my 60csx kept insisting that I go
> to e, even when I had reached point f and beyond using the diversion
> signs. I gave up in the end and reverted to paper!

Press Menu from the Routes page and see if the Route Leg Transition is
set to Auto. That controls when it advances to the next waypoint.

Jack

Posted by A on May 13, 2008, 10:51 am


On 13/05/08 12:44, Jack Erbes wrote:
>> When my idea of how to get there disagrees with Mapsource's, I add
>> waypoints along the route until it does what I want.
>> This works well, unless the route gets recalculated - e.g. for a local
>> diversion - when the 60Cx ignores all of the in-between waypoints and
>> calculates a route from here direct to the destination!

> I seem to remember that automatic route recalculation for Follow Road
> routes will take you to the next waypoint and through the remaining
> waypoints if the route was built with waypoints in MapSource and those
> were uploaded to the GPS receiver (I have a 76Cx).
> But that would not
> happen if the via points are map points or map lines as you get when you
> just click on the map to build a route.

For me it abandons the via points in all four cases: "real" or map
waypoints, and routes built in the unit or in PC Mapsource.

I never use automatic recalculation, that _shouldn't_ make a difference,
should it?

A.