![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Traffic/Data receivers sold where not usable
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 03-03-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Traffic/Data receivers sold where not usable
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 03-04-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Traffic/Data receivers sold where not usable
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 03-04-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Traffic/Data receivers sold where not usable
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 03-05-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: Traffic/Data receivers sold where not usable
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 03-03-2009 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Jeffrey Kaplan wrote:
Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
TulsaOK wrote:
> Jeffrey Kaplan wrote:
>> I have come to the conclusion that Garmin should not sell add-on
>> traffic/data receivers in areas that do not get such service.
>> I checked the service coverage maps. I live in an area that is,
>> according to MSN Direct's maps, in a fringe area smack-dab in the
>> middle between not two, but three full-service areas. The metro
>> centers of each is roughly an hour away. The NavTeq system's map ends
>> before it shows my area, but based on what I can see of it, it +should+
>> cover me. The ClearChannel system lists my area as covered, even
>> though the map of the area won't show. It does list the radio stations
>> that transmit the data, and I can receive both of them from my car.
>> Unfortunately, the ClearChannel system is incompatible with my 255W.
>> The only Garmin traffic receiver I can find in a store is the MSN
>> Direct, so I bought it. First, I made sure that it was returnable.
>> It is completely unusable anywhere near where I live. And on top of
>> that, I had to travel significantly into a covered metro area before it
>> would indicate that it was receiving any signal.
>> The MSN Direct receiver should not be available here.
>> traffic/data receivers in areas that do not get such service.
>> I checked the service coverage maps. I live in an area that is,
>> according to MSN Direct's maps, in a fringe area smack-dab in the
>> middle between not two, but three full-service areas. The metro
>> centers of each is roughly an hour away. The NavTeq system's map ends
>> before it shows my area, but based on what I can see of it, it +should+
>> cover me. The ClearChannel system lists my area as covered, even
>> though the map of the area won't show. It does list the radio stations
>> that transmit the data, and I can receive both of them from my car.
>> Unfortunately, the ClearChannel system is incompatible with my 255W.
>> The only Garmin traffic receiver I can find in a store is the MSN
>> Direct, so I bought it. First, I made sure that it was returnable.
>> It is completely unusable anywhere near where I live. And on top of
>> that, I had to travel significantly into a covered metro area before it
>> would indicate that it was receiving any signal.
>> The MSN Direct receiver should not be available here.
>
> Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
> Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
Best comment I've seen today!
--
Jack
Get general GPS information at: http://www.gpsinformation.net/
Previously on alt.satellite.gps.garmin, TulsaOK said:
> Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
Excuse you? Politics has nothing to do with it. Get lost.
--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
Double ROT13 encoded for your protection
"Try to look unimportant; they may be low on ammo." - Infantry
Journal
> Previously on alt.satellite.gps.garmin, TulsaOK said:
>
>
> > Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
> > you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
> > you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
>
> Excuse you? Politics has nothing to do with it. Get lost.
> Excuse you? Politics has nothing to do with it. Get lost.
Is it politic? I thought someone with some type of mental illness <bg>
Jeffrey Kaplan wrote:
> Previously on alt.satellite.gps.garmin, TulsaOK said:
>
>
>> Just be patient. I'm sure Obama will take care of you, and others like
>> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
>> you, in the near future. God forbid you should have to think for yourself.
>
> Excuse you? Politics has nothing to do with it. Get lost.
>
> Excuse you? Politics has nothing to do with it. Get lost.
>
> Get lost.
That's an odd thing to say in a Garmin newsgroup.
- Traffic info
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-02-11
- Traffic Data
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2007-02-21
- Traffic Flow Sensors
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-01-21
- Nuvi 660 Traffic receiver question
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-08-02
- Which traffic?
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-06-08
- RDS-TMC or Tom Tom Traffic
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2006-11-30









> traffic/data receivers in areas that do not get such service.
>
> I checked the service coverage maps. I live in an area that is,
> according to MSN Direct's maps, in a fringe area smack-dab in the
> middle between not two, but three full-service areas. The metro
> centers of each is roughly an hour away. The NavTeq system's map ends
> before it shows my area, but based on what I can see of it, it +should+
> cover me. The ClearChannel system lists my area as covered, even
> though the map of the area won't show. It does list the radio stations
> that transmit the data, and I can receive both of them from my car.
> Unfortunately, the ClearChannel system is incompatible with my 255W.
>
> The only Garmin traffic receiver I can find in a store is the MSN
> Direct, so I bought it. First, I made sure that it was returnable.
>
> It is completely unusable anywhere near where I live. And on top of
> that, I had to travel significantly into a covered metro area before it
> would indicate that it was receiving any signal.
>
> The MSN Direct receiver should not be available here.
>