Page 2 of 2   << first < 1 2
Bookmark this page: Add OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer to Yahoo MyWeb Add OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer to Google Bookmarks Add OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer to Windows Live Add OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer to Del.icio.us Digg OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer! Add OVI  maps take off   The Inquirer to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by claudegps on February 5, 2010, 4:11 am


> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:53:59 -0800 (PST), NickTheBatMan
> >> More on the NAV4ALL shutdown mentioned at the end of the BBC story:
> >>http://www.gpsbusinessnews.com/Nav4all-Stops-Service,-Blames-NAVTEQ_a..=
.
> >> " . . . the trend shown at Nokia-NAVTEQ and TomTom-Tele Atlas is a bit
> >> worrying for the rest of the industry. The step by step integration of
> >> Tele Atlas into TomTom and the free navigation offer from Nokia is
> >> starting to create market distortions. . . . =A0Looking at it from a
> >> broader perspective, it seems the two map makers are slowly but surely
> >> sliding away from the promises made to the European Commission two
> >> years ago when their acquisitions were investigated by the anti-trust
> >> authority. One day or another Brussels could have a second look at
> >> it."
> >>http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/Features/408214/nokias_first_blood_in_..=
.
> >> "A free version of Ovi Maps for 10 handsets has turned the navigation
> >> industry on its head. The question yet to be answered is exactly how
> >> Nokia will make up the losses on its old mapping revenue (if indeed
> >> there ever was much revenue from its pay-as-you-use pricing models)."
> >And now it's getting out there everywhere...
> >Thishttp://www.redferret.net/?p=3D18498is an interesting piece that
> >makes it quite plain that Garmin could well be in trouble because of
> >their reliance on Navteq which of course is Wholly Nokia owned !!!
> >Interesting times ahead...
> The best being that Garmin's map prices should plummet to almost free if

The problem is that they pay the maps to Navteq :)

> they hope to stay afloat. If not, then all pre-existing map products of
> theirs will just become world-wide public domain data eventually. Their

Public domain?




Posted by NickTheBatMan on February 21, 2010, 5:37 am


> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:53:59 -0800 (PST), NickTheBatMan
> >> More on the NAV4ALL shutdown mentioned at the end of the BBC story:
> >>http://www.gpsbusinessnews.com/Nav4all-Stops-Service,-Blames-NAVTEQ_a..=
.
> >> " . . . the trend shown at Nokia-NAVTEQ and TomTom-Tele Atlas is a bit
> >> worrying for the rest of the industry. The step by step integration of
> >> Tele Atlas into TomTom and the free navigation offer from Nokia is
> >> starting to create market distortions. . . . =A0Looking at it from a
> >> broader perspective, it seems the two map makers are slowly but surely
> >> sliding away from the promises made to the European Commission two
> >> years ago when their acquisitions were investigated by the anti-trust
> >> authority. One day or another Brussels could have a second look at
> >> it."
> >>http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/Features/408214/nokias_first_blood_in_..=
.
> >> "A free version of Ovi Maps for 10 handsets has turned the navigation
> >> industry on its head. The question yet to be answered is exactly how
> >> Nokia will make up the losses on its old mapping revenue (if indeed
> >> there ever was much revenue from its pay-as-you-use pricing models)."
> >And now it's getting out there everywhere...
> >Thishttp://www.redferret.net/?p=3D18498is an interesting piece that
> >makes it quite plain that Garmin could well be in trouble because of
> >their reliance on Navteq which of course is Wholly Nokia owned !!!
> >Interesting times ahead...
> The best being that Garmin's map prices should plummet to almost free if
> they hope to stay afloat. If not, then all pre-existing map products of
> theirs will just become world-wide public domain data eventually. Their
> bean-counters and associated dependent CEOs certainly have their jobs and
> continued revenues at stake. Ain't freedom of information wunderful? :-)

Never thought of it that way :)

As I said, interesting times ahead...

Page 2 of 2   << first < 1 2