Page 5 of 5   << first < 3 4 5
Bookmark this page: Add Nuvi 1490T to Yahoo MyWeb Add Nuvi 1490T to Google Bookmarks Add Nuvi 1490T to Windows Live Add Nuvi 1490T to Del.icio.us Digg Nuvi 1490T! Add Nuvi 1490T to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Joel on April 19, 2010, 5:56 pm



> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:04 -0500, Joel wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
> >>>
> >>>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
> >>>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
> >>>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
your
> >>>>>> recent comments.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him
and he
> >>>>> might go away.
> >>>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> >>>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >>>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
> >>>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
> >>>>the same poster as the old behavior
> >>>
> >>> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> >>> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> >>> saying. :)
> >>
> >> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
> >>
> >> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
> >> access.
> >>
> >> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
> >> demanding that I go away :-)
> >
> >         Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
> > kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
> > kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and it
> > happens to be one of them "invalids"
>
> You have no say in what I post or to whom I reply.

        Do I need to say that, or why can't you figure it out. I responsed to
what you QUOTED, so unless you have the name of poster and part of the
original removed then it's a different story, else I response to whatever in
the message *not* what you guys talking in privated conversation.

        As I said, I have many jerks kill-filed so I don't see all messages but
very few.

Posted by Gene E. Bloch on April 19, 2010, 6:25 pm


On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:56:13 -0500, Joel wrote:

>
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:04 -0500, Joel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>>>>>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>>>>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
your
>>>>>>>> recent comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him
and he
>>>>>>> might go away.
>>>>>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
>>>>>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>>>>>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>>>>>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>>>>>>the same poster as the old behavior
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
>>>>> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
>>>>> saying. :)
>>>>
>>>> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
>>>>
>>>> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
>>>> access.
>>>>
>>>> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
>>>> demanding that I go away :-)
>>>
>>>         Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
>>> kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
>>> kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and it
>>> happens to be one of them "invalids"
>>
>> You have no say in what I post or to whom I reply.
>
>         Do I need to say that, or why can't you figure it out. I responsed to
> what you QUOTED, so unless you have the name of poster and part of the
> original removed then it's a different story, else I response to whatever in
> the message *not* what you guys talking in privated conversation.
>
>         As I said, I have many jerks kill-filed so I don't see all messages but
> very few.

I am hereby wasting my time once more :-)

You responded to *my post*.

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom

Posted by Joel on April 19, 2010, 10:10 pm



> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:56:13 -0500, Joel wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:04 -0500, Joel wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
> >>>>>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you
are
> >>>>>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some
of your
> >>>>>>>> recent comments.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him
and he
> >>>>>>> might go away.
> >>>>>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> >>>>>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >>>>>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the
most
> >>>>>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming
from
> >>>>>>the same poster as the old behavior
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> >>>>> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> >>>>> saying. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
> >>>> access.
> >>>>
> >>>> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
> >>>> demanding that I go away :-)
> >>>
> >>>         Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
> >>> kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
> >>> kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and
it
> >>> happens to be one of them "invalids"
> >>
> >> You have no say in what I post or to whom I reply.
> >
> >         Do I need to say that, or why can't you figure it out. I responsed to
> > what you QUOTED, so unless you have the name of poster and part of the
> > original removed then it's a different story, else I response to whatever in
> > the message *not* what you guys talking in privated conversation.
> >
> >         As I said, I have many jerks kill-filed so I don't see all messages but
> > very few.
>
> I am hereby wasting my time once more :-)

        You sure would.

> You responded to *my post*.

        Yes, I responsed to the message you quoted someone's message.

Posted by Mike Lane on April 9, 2010, 3:48 am


Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 9, 2010:

> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>
>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>
>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
>>> recent comments.
>>
>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
>> he
>> might go away.
>
> He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> advice is not going to work, IMO.
>
Yes but the trouble is, I added him to my noise filter some time ago but I
still get all his posts because of the replies he gets.

--
Mike Lane
UK North Yorkshire
email: mike_lane at mac dot com


Page 5 of 5   << first < 3 4 5
Related Posts
  • Subject
  • Posted In
  • Date