Bookmark this page:
- Nuvi-1490T
- 04-07-2010
  Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Sunshine | 04-08-2010 |
  Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-08-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-08-2010 |
  Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Mike Lane | 04-08-2010 |
 Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-08-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Just Me | 04-09-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-19-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-19-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Gene E. Bloch | 04-19-2010 |
| Re: Nuvi 1490T
| Mike Lane | 04-09-2010 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>
>>
>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
>>> recent comments.
>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
>>> recent comments.
>>
>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and he
>> might go away.
>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and he
>> might go away.
>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>the same poster as the old behavior
>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>the same poster as the old behavior
Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
saying. :)
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>
>
> >On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
> >> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
> >>
> >>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
> >>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
> >>> recent comments.
> >>
> >> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
he
> >>
> >>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
> >>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
> >>> recent comments.
> >>
> >> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
> >> might go away.
> >He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> >advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
> >gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
> >the same poster as the old behavior
> >advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
> >gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
> >the same poster as the old behavior
>
> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> saying. :)
> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> saying. :)
Neah! he is saying that we have too many stupid jerks here.
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>
>
>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>>
>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
>>>> recent comments.
>>>
>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
he
>>>
>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of your
>>>> recent comments.
>>>
>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
>>> might go away.
>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>>the same poster as the old behavior
>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>>the same poster as the old behavior
>
> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> saying. :)
> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> saying. :)
That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
access.
* No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
demanding that I go away :-)
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
> >>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
> >>>
> >>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
> >>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
your
> >>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
> >>>
> >>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
> >>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
> >>>> recent comments.
> >>>
> >>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
he
> >>>
> >>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
> >>> might go away.
> >>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> >>advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
> >>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
> >>the same poster as the old behavior
> >>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
> >>advice is not going to work, IMO.
> >>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
> >>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
> >>the same poster as the old behavior
> >
> > Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> > he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> > saying. :)
> > Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
> > he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
> > saying. :)
>
> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
>
> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
> access.
>
> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
> demanding that I go away :-)
> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
>
> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
> access.
>
> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
> demanding that I go away :-)
Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and it
happens to be one of them "invalids"
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:04 -0500, Joel wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:07:46 -0700, Just Me wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:18:56 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>>>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
your
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:54:12 +0100, Mike Lane wrote:
>>>>> Gene E. Bloch wrote on Apr 8, 2010:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Joel, you would be better off if you were to take stock of what you are
>>>>>> doing and rethink whether to continue to post in the manner of some of
>>>>>> recent comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
he
>>>>>
>>>>> He's just trolling, and you're encouraging him by replying. Ignore him and
>>>>> might go away.
>>>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
>>>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>>>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>>>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>>>>the same poster as the old behavior
>>>
>>> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
>>> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
>>> saying. :)
>>>>He's been around forever, and even responds to his own posts, so your
>>>>advice is not going to work, IMO.
>>>>His behavior in the GPS NGs has recently changed, however. I'm not the most
>>>>gifted interpreter of headers, but the new behavior seems to be coming from
>>>>the same poster as the old behavior
>>>
>>> Could it be that this newsgroup isn't as lively as it used to be and
>>> he's getting bored? Or maybe his on a different antidepressant? Just
>>> saying. :)
>>
>> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
>>
>> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
>> access.
>>
>> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
>> demanding that I go away :-)
>> That's it! Thanks for the update :-)
>>
>> I'm back by popular demand* after a week visiting family, with no Usenet
>> access.
>>
>> * No, "popular demand" wasn't Usenet asking me back, it was family
>> demanding that I go away :-)
>
> Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
> kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
> kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and it
> happens to be one of them "invalids"
> Thanks for repsonsing to the idiot that I happen to have it in my
> kill-file so I didn't see it to repsonce to it personally. No I didn't
> kill-file this specific idiot but I happen to kill-file the "invalid" and it
> happens to be one of them "invalids"
You have no say in what I post or to whom I reply.
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
- NUVI 1490T
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-02-24
- garmin nuvi 1490T
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-09-22
- New CNET Video Reviews 3790T & 1490T
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-28
- From StreetPilot 2610 to nuvi 855
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-16
- transfer maps from 1 Nuvi to another
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-09
- Nuvi 765T Question
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-27
- Nuvi - saving
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-01
- Which microSD cards in a Nuvi 255
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-07-06
