Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add MapSource Elevation Question to Yahoo MyWeb Add MapSource Elevation Question to Google Bookmarks Add MapSource Elevation Question to Windows Live Add MapSource Elevation Question to Del.icio.us Digg MapSource Elevation Question! Add MapSource Elevation Question to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Left-is-Gauche on August 11, 2010, 12:39 pm


For the first time, I uploaded Track and WayPoint data from two recent
hikes using my GPSmap 60CX and was able to plot a vertical profile of
the hikes complete with elevations and distances over the entire 10
miles of track data.

Two Questions:

1. Where are these elevations coming from? MapSource? There's nothing
on Mapsource to indicate topography and elevations. I don't believe my
GPSmap 60CX can determine elevations.

2. How accurate are these elevations, assuming they're coming from
MapSource?

Elevations are nice to know from the device itself. Maybe I should have
bought the 60CSX?

Many thanks for any light shed on this.


Posted by Bert Hyman on August 11, 2010, 12:55 pm


wrote:

> Elevations are nice to know from the device itself. Maybe I should
> have bought the 60CSX?

GPSRs can get elevation data from the satellite fix, but it's relative
to the imaginary sphereoid it thinks you're standing on.

The "S" (sensor) models have a barometric altimeter which reports your
altitude based on the ever-changing barometric pressure, and unless you
know how to calibrate it, probably won't be any more accurate than the
satellite-derived numbers.

--
Bert Hyman        St. Paul, MN        bert@iphouse.com

Posted by Left-is-Gauche on August 11, 2010, 1:00 pm


Bert Hyman wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> Elevations are nice to know from the device itself. Maybe I should
>> have bought the 60CSX?
>
> GPSRs can get elevation data from the satellite fix, but it's relative
> to the imaginary sphereoid it thinks you're standing on.
>
> The "S" (sensor) models have a barometric altimeter which reports your
> altitude based on the ever-changing barometric pressure, and unless you
> know how to calibrate it, probably won't be any more accurate than the
> satellite-derived numbers.
>
Well, thanks Bert.
I just checked one of the Track locations, and yep, there is a satellite
derived altitude. Somehow, I missed that.

Posted by Sunshine on August 11, 2010, 2:29 pm



>wrote:
>> Elevations are nice to know from the device itself. Maybe I should
>> have bought the 60CSX?
>GPSRs can get elevation data from the satellite fix, but it's relative
>to the imaginary sphereoid it thinks you're standing on.

Why do you say it's relative? It's simply calculated, no different
from your Lat/Long, right?


Posted by Gene E. Bloch on August 11, 2010, 2:48 pm


On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:29:47 -0500, Sunshine wrote:

>
>>wrote:
>>> Elevations are nice to know from the device itself. Maybe I should
>>> have bought the 60CSX?
>>GPSRs can get elevation data from the satellite fix, but it's relative
>>to the imaginary sphereoid it thinks you're standing on.
>
> Why do you say it's relative? It's simply calculated, no different
> from your Lat/Long, right?

The spheroid defines the zero-point.

The satellite data could give you the distance from the center of the
earth, but that's not the usual reference for altitude; mean sea level or
the assumed spheroid are possible references.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>