
- How-to-fix-wrong-navigation
- 12-29-2009
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I recently got a Nuvi 255W and tried it out yesterday, over a route
that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
shortest distance
It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
just to see if I might be wrong
It was by far longer and farther
I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
avoidance
The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
I can't find any other setting which might help me
Can you help ??
TIA
JIMBO
No - there is no feedback like with Tom Tom -
I also have wondered a couple of times how going "out of the way"
might actually be "faster". I think it just looks at the known/posted speed
limits
and adds up the time per segment travelled.
As a comparison - you might try Google Maps or Mapquest,
and see what it shows for your point A to point B...
You can then modify the map by dragging segments to different corners
to mimic "your" route or even the "Garmin" route,
and compare the estimated times...
jimbohh wrote:
> I recently got a Nuvi 255W and tried it out yesterday, over a route
> that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
> shortest distance
> It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
> just to see if I might be wrong
> It was by far longer and farther
> I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
> avoidance
> The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
> route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
> I can't find any other setting which might help me
> Can you help ??
> TIA
> JIMBO
> that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
> shortest distance
> It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
> just to see if I might be wrong
> It was by far longer and farther
> I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
> avoidance
> The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
> route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
> I can't find any other setting which might help me
> Can you help ??
> TIA
> JIMBO
That is w hy I still use my paper maps at times. GPS is a great tool, but
sometimes the computer logic just does not work as well as it should.
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:04 -0800 (PST), jimbohh
>I recently got a Nuvi 255W and tried it out yesterday, over a route
>that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
>shortest distance
>It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
>just to see if I might be wrong
>It was by far longer and farther
>I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
>avoidance
>The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
>route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
>I can't find any other setting which might help me
>Can you help ??
>that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
>shortest distance
>It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
>just to see if I might be wrong
>It was by far longer and farther
>I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
>avoidance
>The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
>route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
>I can't find any other setting which might help me
>Can you help ??
Turn off ALL avoidances and try again. Avoiding "traffic" may well
have ruled out your route.
jimbohh wrote on Dec 29, 2009:
> I recently got a Nuvi 255W and tried it out yesterday, over a route
> that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
> shortest distance
>
> It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
> just to see if I might be wrong
>
> It was by far longer and farther
>
> I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
> avoidance
>
> The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
> route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
>
> I can't find any other setting which might help me
>
> that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
> shortest distance
>
> It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
> just to see if I might be wrong
>
> It was by far longer and farther
>
> I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
> avoidance
>
> The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
> route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
>
> I can't find any other setting which might help me
>
The only way you will be able to navigate by gps on EXACTLY the route that
you choose is to swap your unit for a more advanced model such as the Nuvi
755, or the 1450. These have what Garmin call "Multiple point routing" which
means you can set a number of via points so that it will follow exactly the
route you want.
I always do this before going on a long trip, otherwise, whatever avoidances
or preferences I set, the unit at some point will always choose roads that I
don't want to go on. You can adjust the route directly on the unit if
necessary, but it's much easier using a program such as MapSource (or better
still RoadTrip on a Mac).
--
Mike Lane
UK North Yorkshire
email: mike_lane at mac dot com
- The Coast Guard Navigation Center is currently experiencing a phone outage
- Satellite Navigation
- 2011-07-13
- iSailGPS 1.0 - Marine GPS Navigation for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch
- Global Positioning System
- 2011-04-30
- iSailGPS 1.0 - Marine GPS Navigation for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch
- Satellite Navigation
- 2011-04-30
- in dash navigation
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-10-11
- Nokia 2710 Navigation Edition
- Magellan GPS
- 2009-12-10
- POI wrong on Nuvi. How to report?
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-09-15

> that I have used numerous times, which is both the fastest and the
> shortest distance
> It gave me a route that was WAY out of the way - which I took anyhow -
> just to see if I might be wrong
> It was by far longer and farther
> I used "shortest time" for route preference and "Traffic" as the only
> avoidance
> The only thing that I can say that may have "fooled" it is that MY
> route is largely over two lane roads (one in each direction)
> I can't find any other setting which might help me
> Can you help ??
> TIA
> JIMBO