
- Garmin-handheld-question
- 04-09-2009
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I've been considering the purchase of a basic Garmin
handheld, mainly for geocaching and recording trails of
bushwalks. From what I can tell from their website, the
basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need the
mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA
that has full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life
for continuous use on a long hike, but is fine for
on-look-off type use).
But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is
"geocaching friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly
higher end models like the GPS60 say yes.
I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find
what it means when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex
can hold 500 waypoints and allows connection to a computer,
so I'm curious what else is needed to be "geocaching
friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead
of the etrex. The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the
same receiver, and I don't need the map feature.
--
Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be
completed in black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
For openers, I don't think it's necessary to have the unit on
constantly except in special situations. I have had a Garmin-12 for
quite a long time and now have added the Legend HCX. Taking a fix
every so often, such as near significant features or forks in the
trail, is usually quite enough. Transfer your data points to any
mapping software and you're all set. The Legend has geocaching
features, but I find simply taking fixes every now and then or
entering waypoints for a go-to by hand is simple, easy & accurate.
> I've been considering the purchase of a basic Garmin handheld, mainly for
> geocaching and recording trails of bushwalks. From what I can tell from
> their website, the basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need
> the mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA that has
> full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life for continuous use on a
> long hike, but is fine for on-look-off type use).
> But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is "geocaching
> friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly higher end models like the
> GPS60 say yes.
> I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find what it means
> when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex can hold 500 waypoints and
> allows connection to a computer, so I'm curious what else is needed to be
> "geocaching friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
> these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
> Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead of the etrex.
> The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the same receiver, and I don't
> need the map feature.
> --
> Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be completed in
> black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
> geocaching and recording trails of bushwalks. From what I can tell from
> their website, the basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need
> the mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA that has
> full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life for continuous use on a
> long hike, but is fine for on-look-off type use).
> But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is "geocaching
> friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly higher end models like the
> GPS60 say yes.
> I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find what it means
> when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex can hold 500 waypoints and
> allows connection to a computer, so I'm curious what else is needed to be
> "geocaching friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
> these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
> Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead of the etrex.
> The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the same receiver, and I don't
> need the map feature.
> --
> Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be completed in
> black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
I would spend a little extra to get the eTrex H model. The high sensitivity
receiver makes a world of difference when in difficult reception conditions
such as dense foliage.
The geocaching mode lets you select a symbol (usually the closed treasure
chest) for geocaches. There is a separate "find" menu that selects only
waypoints with the geocache symbol. When you do a goto "off road" for the
geocache, you get a unique screen with a button for "found". This changes
the symbol to an open treasure chest, records it on the day's calendar, and
gives you the option to "find next", the next closest geocache.
Klatch wrote:
>> I've been considering the purchase of a basic Garmin handheld, mainly for
>> geocaching and recording trails of bushwalks. From what I can tell from
>> their website, the basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need
>> the mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA that has
>> full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life for continuous use on a
>> long hike, but is fine for on-look-off type use).
>> But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is "geocaching
>> friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly higher end models like the
>> GPS60 say yes.
>> I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find what it means
>> when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex can hold 500 waypoints and
>> allows connection to a computer, so I'm curious what else is needed to be
>> "geocaching friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
>> these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
>> Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead of the etrex.
>> The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the same receiver, and I don't
>> need the map feature.
>> --
>> Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be completed in
>> black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
>> geocaching and recording trails of bushwalks. From what I can tell from
>> their website, the basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need
>> the mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA that has
>> full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life for continuous use on a
>> long hike, but is fine for on-look-off type use).
>> But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is "geocaching
>> friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly higher end models like the
>> GPS60 say yes.
>> I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find what it means
>> when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex can hold 500 waypoints and
>> allows connection to a computer, so I'm curious what else is needed to be
>> "geocaching friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
>> these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
>> Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead of the etrex.
>> The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the same receiver, and I don't
>> need the map feature.
>> --
>> Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be completed in
>> black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
>
> I would spend a little extra to get the eTrex H model. The high sensitivity
> receiver makes a world of difference when in difficult reception conditions
> such as dense foliage.
> The geocaching mode lets you select a symbol (usually the closed treasure
> chest) for geocaches. There is a separate "find" menu that selects only
> waypoints with the geocache symbol. When you do a goto "off road" for the
> geocache, you get a unique screen with a button for "found". This changes
> the symbol to an open treasure chest, records it on the day's calendar, and
> gives you the option to "find next", the next closest geocache.
>
>
Thank you, that answers my question. Sounds like the Etrex
> I would spend a little extra to get the eTrex H model. The high sensitivity
> receiver makes a world of difference when in difficult reception conditions
> such as dense foliage.
> The geocaching mode lets you select a symbol (usually the closed treasure
> chest) for geocaches. There is a separate "find" menu that selects only
> waypoints with the geocache symbol. When you do a goto "off road" for the
> geocache, you get a unique screen with a button for "found". This changes
> the symbol to an open treasure chest, records it on the day's calendar, and
> gives you the option to "find next", the next closest geocache.
>
>
will be perfectly usable for what I want. The geocaching
functions would be handy, but I'll still have my PDA to do
the logging (including upload to GC.Com), but it is not a
function that is critical for use. The PDA has been
perfectly good, but I'm thinking of getting something with
better battery life (and regular batteries), so I've got
something for extended walks.
Actually it is the Etrex H I was looking at. they are
$149AUS, vs $249AUS for the GPS 60. I can get a 2nd hand
regular Etrex for $70, but I think I'd rather go for a new
unit with warranty and the better receiver.
--
Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be
completed in black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?
> Thank you, that answers my question. Sounds like the Etrex
> will be perfectly usable for what I want. The geocaching
> functions would be handy, but I'll still have my PDA to do
> the logging (including upload to GC.Com), but it is not a
> function that is critical for use. The PDA has been
> perfectly good, but I'm thinking of getting something with
> better battery life (and regular batteries), so I've got
> something for extended walks.
> Actually it is the Etrex H I was looking at. they are
> $149AUS, vs $249AUS for the GPS 60. I can get a 2nd hand
> regular Etrex for $70, but I think I'd rather go for a new
> unit with warranty and the better receiver.
> will be perfectly usable for what I want. The geocaching
> functions would be handy, but I'll still have my PDA to do
> the logging (including upload to GC.Com), but it is not a
> function that is critical for use. The PDA has been
> perfectly good, but I'm thinking of getting something with
> better battery life (and regular batteries), so I've got
> something for extended walks.
> Actually it is the Etrex H I was looking at. they are
> $149AUS, vs $249AUS for the GPS 60. I can get a 2nd hand
> regular Etrex for $70, but I think I'd rather go for a new
> unit with warranty and the better receiver.
I don't know what kind of battery your new GPS uses, but it uses AA
battery then I would suggest to invest in Eneloop (pre-charged) batteries
which is the newer generation which hold the charge much longer then the
older generation.
If you spend lot of time in the jungle and don't wanna get lost, then you
may wanna do some research on panel solar-charger which can be rolled up
like a sheet of pastic. I don't own any but have done little research over
a year ago.
- Garmin Keygen version 1.3 by JetMouse
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-01-03
- Garmin Connect question about Split
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-09-04
- Garmin Nuvi question
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-07-26
- Question about microSD data cards
- Garmin GPS
- 2007-09-11
- Newbie Question re ETA`
- Garmin GPS
- 2007-12-18
- Garmin 60Csx, Sandisk 4GB Micro Sdhc?
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-03-31
- Garmin 2720 question
- Garmin GPS
- 2006-07-04
- Garmin C550 Question
- Garmin GPS
- 2006-08-09
- Garmin 76csx
- Garmin GPS
- 2006-08-08
- Garmin Quest question
- Garmin GPS
- 2005-07-18

> handheld, mainly for geocaching and recording trails of
> bushwalks. From what I can tell from their website, the
> basic etrex would fit the bill. I don't think I need the
> mapping capability that higher end models have (I have a PDA
> that has full maps, it just doesn't have the battery life
> for continuous use on a long hike, but is fine for
> on-look-off type use).
> But on the garmin website one of the spec it lists is
> "geocaching friendly" for which it says "no". Slightly
> higher end models like the GPS60 say yes.
> I've had a look at their website, and can't actually find
> what it means when they say geocaching friendly. The Etrex
> can hold 500 waypoints and allows connection to a computer,
> so I'm curious what else is needed to be "geocaching
> friendly". Anyone have any idea what it is specific about
> these GPSr's that makes them geocaching friendly?
> Otherwise I can't see a reason why to buy the GPS60 instead
> of the etrex. The etrex is $100 cheaper, appears to have the
> same receiver, and I don't need the map feature.
> --
> Have you ever noticed that all legal documents need to be
> completed in black or blue pen, but we vote in pencil?