
- FM-traffic
- 12-01-2009
![]() Re: FM traffic
| Mike Russell | 12-01-2009 |
![]() ![]() Re: FM traffic
| Peter H. Coffin | 12-02-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: FM traffic
| Jeffrey Kaplan | 12-02-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: FM traffic
| Mickey | 12-03-2009 |
![]() Re: FM traffic
| Bob Muncie | 12-02-2009 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Thinking about purchasing a subscription to FM traffic. See Garmin
offering service from 2 different companies, Navtec and Clear Channel.
Looking for comments about either provider. The good, bad, or ugly.
Mickey
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:57:59 -0800, Mickey wrote:
No personal experience. The most common complaint is coverage - people
purchase the FM subscription and then find that it doesn't cover the area
they need. I would recommend against purchasing the lifetime subscription
option, since the lifetime of this technology is probably going to be very
short.
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:31:20 -0800, Mike Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:57:59 -0800, Mickey wrote:
>> Thinking about purchasing a subscription to FM traffic. See Garmin
>> offering service from 2 different companies, Navtec and Clear Channel.
>>
>> Looking for comments about either provider. The good, bad, or ugly.
>> offering service from 2 different companies, Navtec and Clear Channel.
>>
>> Looking for comments about either provider. The good, bad, or ugly.
> No personal experience. The most common complaint is coverage - people
> purchase the FM subscription and then find that it doesn't cover the area
> they need. I would recommend against purchasing the lifetime subscription
> option, since the lifetime of this technology is probably going to be very
> short.
> purchase the FM subscription and then find that it doesn't cover the area
> they need. I would recommend against purchasing the lifetime subscription
> option, since the lifetime of this technology is probably going to be very
> short.
The MSN Direct version, for example, has already announced end of life
for (IIRC) January 2012.
--
91. I will not ignore the messenger that stumbles in exhausted and
obviously agitated until my personal grooming or current
entertainment is finished. It might actually be important.
--Peter Anspach's list of things to do as an Evil Overlord
Previously on alt.satellite.gps.garmin, Peter H. Coffin said:
> The MSN Direct version, for example, has already announced end of life
> for (IIRC) January 2012.
> for (IIRC) January 2012.
That may have to do more with the fact that it's an overblown and slow
system with poor coverage. Making it something not worth subscribing
to, so people didn't resulting in it not bringing in enough revenue for
Microsoft to continue it. At least they're providing ample notice of
its shut-down.
I tried it earlier in the year. According to their service map, at ~10
miles north-northwest of Portsmouth NH, I am +barely+ within their
coverage area for the metro Boston market. Their maps are optimistic,
I had to travel almost to Danvers MA before the receiver picked up
enough signal to be useful. By their maps, I should have had
sufficient signal by the time I reached Portsmouth.
From past experience with Clearchannel (I think, whatever was included
with the Navigon) I am well within their coverage areas. I never got
it separately after returning the MSN receiver because I realized that
just for traffic, with where and when I go, it would almost never
change the route I take. I had tried the MSN system for its other
capabilities such as sending pre-defined routes to the unit and finding
gas prices.
--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
Double ROT13 encoded for your protection
"If you don't have any ambitions, the minimum-wage job isn't going to
get you to where you want to get, for example." - George W. Bush, Aug
29, 2002
wrote:
> Previously on alt.satellite.gps.garmin, Peter H. Coffin said:
>> The MSN Direct version, for example, has already announced end of life
>> for (IIRC) January 2012.
>> for (IIRC) January 2012.
> That may have to do more with the fact that it's an overblown and slow
> system with poor coverage. Making it something not worth subscribing
> to, so people didn't resulting in it not bringing in enough revenue for
> Microsoft to continue it. At least they're providing ample notice of
> its shut-down.
> I tried it earlier in the year. According to their service map, at ~10
> miles north-northwest of Portsmouth NH, I am +barely+ within their
> coverage area for the metro Boston market. Their maps are optimistic,
> I had to travel almost to Danvers MA before the receiver picked up
> enough signal to be useful. By their maps, I should have had
> sufficient signal by the time I reached Portsmouth.
> From past experience with Clearchannel (I think, whatever was included
> with the Navigon) I am well within their coverage areas. I never got
> it separately after returning the MSN receiver because I realized that
> just for traffic, with where and when I go, it would almost never
> change the route I take. I had tried the MSN system for its other
> capabilities such as sending pre-defined routes to the unit and finding
> gas prices.
> system with poor coverage. Making it something not worth subscribing
> to, so people didn't resulting in it not bringing in enough revenue for
> Microsoft to continue it. At least they're providing ample notice of
> its shut-down.
> I tried it earlier in the year. According to their service map, at ~10
> miles north-northwest of Portsmouth NH, I am +barely+ within their
> coverage area for the metro Boston market. Their maps are optimistic,
> I had to travel almost to Danvers MA before the receiver picked up
> enough signal to be useful. By their maps, I should have had
> sufficient signal by the time I reached Portsmouth.
> From past experience with Clearchannel (I think, whatever was included
> with the Navigon) I am well within their coverage areas. I never got
> it separately after returning the MSN receiver because I realized that
> just for traffic, with where and when I go, it would almost never
> change the route I take. I had tried the MSN system for its other
> capabilities such as sending pre-defined routes to the unit and finding
> gas prices.
Thanks for commenting on the question asked.
Mickey
- How does the traffic feature work
- Garmin GPS
- 2011-06-10
- Traffic
- Global Positioning System
- 2010-11-07
- FM Traffic
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-05-13
- Traffic feature on Nuvi 265 useful?
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-18
- Nuvi 7x5T and MSN Direct Traffic
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-01-17
- Traffic Flow Sensors
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-01-21
- 465t traffic update
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-02-18
- Traffic on (and off) route
- Tomtom GPS
- 2009-04-16
- Garmin 2730 / XM / Traffic and Weather
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-06-05
- Tom Tom Traffic
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2009-03-01








> offering service from 2 different companies, Navtec and Clear Channel.
>
> Looking for comments about either provider. The good, bad, or ugly.