
- Elevation
- 08-28-2010
![]() Re: Elevation
| Peter H. Coffin | 08-28-2010 |
![]() Re: Elevation
| Frank | 08-28-2010 |
![]() Re: Elevation
| Happy Trails | 08-28-2010 |
![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| LightByrd | 08-28-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Happy Trails | 08-29-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| LightByrd | 08-30-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Happy Trails | 08-31-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Art Warner | 08-31-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Happy Trails | 08-29-2010 |
![]() Re: Elevation
| PastaClerk | 08-28-2010 |
![]() Re: Elevation
| Don B | 08-29-2010 |
![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Happy Trails | 09-02-2010 |
![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Art Warner | 09-02-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Sunshine | 09-02-2010 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Elevation
| Art Warner | 09-02-2010 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
You are correct, my mistake. Caches are available internationally for
search by Postal Code, I made the mistake of inferring that the Benchmark
search page was similarly expansive. Benchmarks are currently supplied by
NGS data, and only available for US Zip Codes.
Thanks for correcting my reply. Hope the OP was looking for a benchmark
near a US address.
> wrote:
>>I'm surprised this hasn't already been mentioned based on popularity of
>>Geocaching, but the free Geocache website provides an international list
>>of
>>Benchmarks that can be searched based on your current location.
>>Geocaching, but the free Geocache website provides an international list
>>of
>>Benchmarks that can be searched based on your current location.
> Why do you say "international list . . ."?
> It is NGS data - USA and territories only afaik.
> I put in a couple of Canada postal codes and it says "no data for your
> area"?
> Has anyone seen this to work for other "international" locations?
>
> It is NGS data - USA and territories only afaik.
> I put in a couple of Canada postal codes and it says "no data for your
> area"?
> Has anyone seen this to work for other "international" locations?
>
Sorry, need to correct myself, this is a US only Benchmark listing. The
Geocaches are international, but the benchmarks are only US.
Sorry for my confusion, and any I created.
> wrote:
>>I'm surprised this hasn't already been mentioned based on popularity of
>>Geocaching, but the free Geocache website provides an international list
>>of
>>Benchmarks that can be searched based on your current location.
>>Geocaching, but the free Geocache website provides an international list
>>of
>>Benchmarks that can be searched based on your current location.
> Why do you say "international list . . ."?
> It is NGS data - USA and territories only afaik.
> I put in a couple of Canada postal codes and it says "no data for your
> area"?
> Has anyone seen this to work for other "international" locations?
>
> It is NGS data - USA and territories only afaik.
> I put in a couple of Canada postal codes and it says "no data for your
> area"?
> Has anyone seen this to work for other "international" locations?
>
> The site at: http://www.geocaching.com/ may require you register, but it is
> free. The left navigation includes a link for "Find a Benchmark".
> free. The left navigation includes a link for "Find a Benchmark".
That is handier to use than
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_radius.prl
It didn't like my zip code, so I used a zip nearby.
Looking at one that I already "knew", I made comparison to NGS.
The descriptions are different. Searching for the PID or designation from
the NGS site doesn't retrieve anything in geocaching.
Geocaching:
JT2681 DESIGNATION - BM 96 M
JT2681 PID - JT2681
JT2681* NAD 83(1992)- 38 47 02.43307(N) 122 34 08.15547(W) ADJUSTED
NGS:
DH6285 DESIGNATION - 29 LAK 9.28
DH6285 PID - DH6285
DH6285* NAD 83(2007)- 38 47 02.36495(N) 122 34 09.35439(W) ADJUSTED
Geocaching doesn't seem to be current, as a station added in August 2008
isn't there... or maybe this is only a list of the little brass plates,
and doesn't include CORS stations.
-
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley Lake, CA, USA GPS: 38.8,-122
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:13:14 +0000 (UTC), dold@77.usenet.us.com wrote:
>> The site at: http://www.geocaching.com/ may require you register, but it is
>> free. The left navigation includes a link for "Find a Benchmark".
>> free. The left navigation includes a link for "Find a Benchmark".
>That is handier to use than
>http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_radius.prl
>It didn't like my zip code, so I used a zip nearby.
>Looking at one that I already "knew", I made comparison to NGS.
>The descriptions are different. Searching for the PID or designation from
>the NGS site doesn't retrieve anything in geocaching.
>Geocaching:
>JT2681 DESIGNATION - BM 96 M
>JT2681 PID - JT2681
>JT2681* NAD 83(1992)- 38 47 02.43307(N) 122 34 08.15547(W) ADJUSTED
>NGS:
>DH6285 DESIGNATION - 29 LAK 9.28
>DH6285 PID - DH6285
>DH6285* NAD 83(2007)- 38 47 02.36495(N) 122 34 09.35439(W) ADJUSTED
>Geocaching doesn't seem to be current, as a station added in August 2008
>isn't there... or maybe this is only a list of the little brass plates,
>and doesn't include CORS stations.
>-
>Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley Lake, CA, USA GPS: 38.8,-122
>http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_radius.prl
>It didn't like my zip code, so I used a zip nearby.
>Looking at one that I already "knew", I made comparison to NGS.
>The descriptions are different. Searching for the PID or designation from
>the NGS site doesn't retrieve anything in geocaching.
>Geocaching:
>JT2681 DESIGNATION - BM 96 M
>JT2681 PID - JT2681
>JT2681* NAD 83(1992)- 38 47 02.43307(N) 122 34 08.15547(W) ADJUSTED
>NGS:
>DH6285 DESIGNATION - 29 LAK 9.28
>DH6285 PID - DH6285
>DH6285* NAD 83(2007)- 38 47 02.36495(N) 122 34 09.35439(W) ADJUSTED
>Geocaching doesn't seem to be current, as a station added in August 2008
>isn't there... or maybe this is only a list of the little brass plates,
>and doesn't include CORS stations.
>-
>Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley Lake, CA, USA GPS: 38.8,-122
There's an official benchmark at the SE corner of my property, deep in the
woods. It's been there since the mid to early 1900's (I think), used to
define the 4-corners of adjoining "township" regions. I can't find it in
any benchmark database. They're not all recorded digitally today.
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:53:31 -0500, Art Warner
>There's an official benchmark at the SE corner of my property, deep in the
>woods. It's been there since the mid to early 1900's (I think), used to
>define the 4-corners of adjoining "township" regions. I can't find it in
>any benchmark database. They're not all recorded digitally today.
>woods. It's been there since the mid to early 1900's (I think), used to
>define the 4-corners of adjoining "township" regions. I can't find it in
>any benchmark database. They're not all recorded digitally today.
Maybe they should revisit that area and check for continental drift.
If it's been ~100 years, I would expect it has moved somewhat, either
laterally, vertically, or more likely both.
- 60 Csx elevation anomaly ?
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-20
- MapSource Elevation Question
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-08-12
- Fixed elevation Pints
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-10-23
- Garmin 2720 and elevation info
- Garmin GPS
- 2008-04-14








