Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Add Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx   to Yahoo MyWeb Add Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx   to Google Bookmarks Add Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx   to Windows Live Add Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx   to Del.icio.us Digg Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx  ! Add Compare 60CSx and Etrex Vista HCx   to Netscape
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Beartooth on October 26, 2009, 2:21 pm




        I've studied Garmin's pages for the GPSMAP 60CSx and the etrex
Vista HCx, and I'm still hesitating.

        I want a newer one than the original etrwx vista and the rino 120
that I have, with color display and native USB connections, for running
MapSource (Chiefly TopoUS2008) in order to map my hunting grounds.

        At my age, I'm all too aware that, geologists to the contrary
notwithstanding, these old mountains (in Western VA -- not WV, but close)
get taller and steeper every year. So I don't hunt deer much any more. In
fact, I stick mostly to squirrels.

        That means I hunt smaller areas than most, and probably move
relatively often for anyone this far east; I sit at the base of a tree
for half an hour to an hour, still-hunt for fifty to a hundred yards, and
repeat.

        So I want all the accurate detail I can get.

        Does actual experience, in the field and at the PC, suggest
anything not obvious from the Garmin pages?

--
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
All my hunts succeed -- and sometimes I get meat.

Posted by Pegleg on October 26, 2009, 5:28 pm


Beartooth wrote:
>
>         I've studied Garmin's pages for the GPSMAP 60CSx and the etrex
> Vista HCx, and I'm still hesitating.

>         So I want all the accurate detail I can get.
>
>         Does actual experience, in the field and at the PC, suggest
> anything not obvious from the Garmin pages?
>

60CSx by a long shot!

Posted by Jack Erbes on October 26, 2009, 8:11 pm


Pegleg wrote:
> Beartooth wrote:
>> I've studied Garmin's pages for the GPSMAP 60CSx and the etrex
>> Vista HCx, and I'm still hesitating.
>
>> So I want all the accurate detail I can get.
>> Does actual experience, in the field and at the PC, suggest
>> anything not obvious from the Garmin pages?
>
> 60CSx by a long shot!


I'll second that nomination!

And before you spend too much money on Garmin's topo mapping, check out
the free mapping for your area from here:

http://www.gpsfiledepot.com/

I found much better maps for my area and they were free!

Jack

Posted by frijoli on October 26, 2009, 8:51 pm


Jack Erbes wrote:
> Pegleg wrote:
>> Beartooth wrote:
>>> I've studied Garmin's pages for the GPSMAP 60CSx and the etrex
>>> Vista HCx, and I'm still hesitating.
>>> So I want all the accurate detail I can get.
>>> Does actual experience, in the field and at the PC, suggest
>>> anything not obvious from the Garmin pages?
>> 60CSx by a long shot!
>
>
> I'll second that nomination!
>
> And before you spend too much money on Garmin's topo mapping, check out
> the free mapping for your area from here:
>
> http://www.gpsfiledepot.com/
>
> I found much better maps for my area and they were free!
>
> Jack
60CSx No question!

Posted by Thibaud Taudin Chabot on October 27, 2009, 4:30 am


frijoli schreef:
> Jack Erbes wrote:
>> Pegleg wrote:
>>> Beartooth wrote:
>>>> I've studied Garmin's pages for the GPSMAP 60CSx and the etrex
>>>> Vista HCx, and I'm still hesitating.
>>>> So I want all the accurate detail I can get.
>>>> Does actual experience, in the field and at the PC, suggest
>>>> anything not obvious from the Garmin pages?
>>> 60CSx by a long shot!
>> I'll second that nomination!
>> And before you spend too much money on Garmin's topo mapping, check
>> out the free mapping for your area from here:
>> http://www.gpsfiledepot.com/
>> I found much better maps for my area and they were free!
>> Jack
> 60CSx No question!
or the GPSmap 76CSx?

Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>