
- Accuracy-of-60CS
- 09-07-2005
![]() ![]() Re: Accuracy of 60CS
| Heinrich Pfeife... | 09-07-2005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Accuracy of 60CS
| Chilly Bob | 09-07-2005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Accuracy of 60CS
| Sardious | 09-08-2005 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I just received my Garmin 60CS today and have been playing with it quite a
bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim of
accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about this.
I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
(the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would range
from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache in
a 30 foot radius area!!!
Thanks for any feedback.
-Butters
You need to turn WAAS on..
> You need to turn WAAS on..
you didn't read his posting, did you? He said "I have WAAS enabled".
But I don't think that WAAS will help him. He says he got 4-6 satellites at
that time. This means he was not under clear sky. Maybe he was somewhere in
the woods. The WAAS satellites are harder to receive than the normal GPS
satellites.
--
Heinrich
http://www.gartrip.de
mail: new<at>gartrip.de
>>I just received my Garmin 60CS today and have been playing with it quite a
>> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim
>> of
>> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
>> this.
>> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
>> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
>> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
>> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
>> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
>> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
>> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
>> range
>> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
>> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
>> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
>> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
>> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache
>> in
>> a 30 foot radius area!!!
>> Thanks for any feedback.
>> -Butters
>> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim
>> of
>> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
>> this.
>> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
>> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
>> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
>> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
>> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
>> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
>> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
>> range
>> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
>> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
>> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
>> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
>> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache
>> in
>> a 30 foot radius area!!!
>> Thanks for any feedback.
>> -Butters
>
I asked this same question when I recieved mine. You need to wait 20-30
min. until you see 'S' listed in the satellite bar graphs, then you'll
be <10 ft.
Heinrich Pfeifer wrote:
> > You need to turn WAAS on..
> you didn't read his posting, did you? He said "I have WAAS enabled".
> But I don't think that WAAS will help him. He says he got 4-6 satellites at
> that time. This means he was not under clear sky. Maybe he was somewhere in
> the woods. The WAAS satellites are harder to receive than the normal GPS
> satellites.
> --
> Heinrich
> http://www.gartrip.de
> mail: new<at>gartrip.de
> But I don't think that WAAS will help him. He says he got 4-6 satellites at
> that time. This means he was not under clear sky. Maybe he was somewhere in
> the woods. The WAAS satellites are harder to receive than the normal GPS
> satellites.
> --
> Heinrich
> http://www.gartrip.de
> mail: new<at>gartrip.de
> >>I just received my Garmin 60CS today and have been playing with it quite a
> >> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim
> >> of
> >> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
> >> this.
> >> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
> >> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
> >> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
> >> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
> >> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
> >> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
> >> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
> >> range
> >> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
> >> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
> >> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
> >> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
> >> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache
> >> in
> >> a 30 foot radius area!!!
> >> Thanks for any feedback.
> >> -Butters
> >> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim
> >> of
> >> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
> >> this.
> >> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
> >> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
> >> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
> >> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
> >> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
> >> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
> >> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
> >> range
> >> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
> >> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
> >> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
> >> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
> >> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache
> >> in
> >> a 30 foot radius area!!!
> >> Thanks for any feedback.
> >> -Butters
I am in Colorado even on hikes in the mountains I get 8 satalites and about
12 to 7 foot accuracy. on my car if I hook up the externam antenna (just a
little mighty mouse II) then I get about 6 but have gotten as good as 4 ft
accuracy. I have some "jitter" but usually it is just a foot or 2 of jitter
>I asked this same question when I recieved mine. You need to wait 20-30
> min. until you see 'S' listed in the satellite bar graphs, then you'll
> be <10 ft.
> Heinrich Pfeifer wrote:
> min. until you see 'S' listed in the satellite bar graphs, then you'll
> be <10 ft.
> Heinrich Pfeifer wrote:
>> > You need to turn WAAS on..
>> you didn't read his posting, did you? He said "I have WAAS enabled".
>> But I don't think that WAAS will help him. He says he got 4-6 satellites
>> at
>> that time. This means he was not under clear sky. Maybe he was somewhere
>> in
>> the woods. The WAAS satellites are harder to receive than the normal GPS
>> satellites.
>> --
>> Heinrich
>> http://www.gartrip.de
>> mail: new<at>gartrip.de
>> But I don't think that WAAS will help him. He says he got 4-6 satellites
>> at
>> that time. This means he was not under clear sky. Maybe he was somewhere
>> in
>> the woods. The WAAS satellites are harder to receive than the normal GPS
>> satellites.
>> --
>> Heinrich
>> http://www.gartrip.de
>> mail: new<at>gartrip.de
>> >>I just received my Garmin 60CS today and have been playing with it
>> >>quite a
>> >> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its
>> >> claim
>> >> of
>> >> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
>> >> this.
>> >> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't
>> >> seen
>> >> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
>> >> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache
>> >> to
>> >> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
>> >> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got
>> >> within
>> >> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate
>> >> information
>> >> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
>> >> range
>> >> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
>> >> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
>> >> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new
>> >> at
>> >> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim?
>> >> I
>> >> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small
>> >> cache
>> >> in
>> >> a 30 foot radius area!!!
>> >> Thanks for any feedback.
>> >> -Butters
>> >>quite a
>> >> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its
>> >> claim
>> >> of
>> >> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about
>> >> this.
>> >> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't
>> >> seen
>> >> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
>> >> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache
>> >> to
>> >> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
>> >> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got
>> >> within
>> >> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate
>> >> information
>> >> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would
>> >> range
>> >> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
>> >> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
>> >> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new
>> >> at
>> >> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim?
>> >> I
>> >> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small
>> >> cache
>> >> in
>> >> a 30 foot radius area!!!
>> >> Thanks for any feedback.
>> >> -Butters
>
- Map accuracy
- UK GPS Discussions
- 2011-05-03
- position accuracy question
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-07-29
- Another accuracy question
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-07-26
- map accuracy
- Magellan GPS
- 2009-10-12
- GPSmap 76 CSx accuracy
- Garmin GPS
- 2009-10-25
- View Barometer Data from 60CS?
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-16
- Point accuracy with Garmin 76csx
- Garmin GPS
- 2010-04-19






> bit. One of the reasons I decided to go with the 60CS is for its claim of
> accuracy (3 meters accurate). However, I'm starting to wonder about this.
> I have the accuracy feature turned on the data fields, and I haven't seen
> it lower than 25 feet (far greater than 3 meters). Also, I went on my
> first geocache today in the Seattle area. I picked a 1/1 rated cache to
> start out. Even the posts on the cache claimed it was a 'fun and easy
> cache', however, I had absolutely no luck finding it. When I got within
> about 30 feet of the cache, my GPS started to give inaccurate information
> (the compass would flip all around, and the distance to target would range
> from 8-30 feet while I was standing still). I checked my satellite
> reception and was getting anywhere from 4-6. I have WAAS enabled.
> Is this normal? Should I be getting better accuracy? Since I'm new at
> this, maybe I'm naive to think that the 3 meter thing is a real claim? I
> can't see the fun of geocaching if you have to search for a small cache in
> a 30 foot radius area!!!
> Thanks for any feedback.
> -Butters